<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">accounting</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Учет. Анализ. Аудит</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Accounting. Analysis. Auditing</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2408-9303</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-130X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26794/2408-9303-2022-9-6-36-49</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">accounting-500</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОТЧЕТНОСТЬ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЙ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>REPORTING ORGANIZATIONS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Бухгалтерский подход к корпоративной социальной ответственности</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Accounting Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3823-8447</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Серебрякова</surname><given-names>Т. Ю.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Serebryakova</surname><given-names>T. Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Татьяна Юрьевна Серебрякова — доктор экономических наук, профессор, профессор кафедры экономики и информационных технологий </p><p>Чебоксары</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Tatyana Yu. Serebryakova — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Professor of the Department of economics and information technology, Chair </p><p>Cheboksary</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">tserebryakova@ruc.su</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Чебоксарский кооперативный институт (филиал) Российского университета кооперации</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Cheboksary Cooperative Institute (Branch) of Russian University of Cooperation</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>01</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>36</fpage><lpage>49</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Серебрякова Т.Ю., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Серебрякова Т.Ю.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Serebryakova T.Y.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://accounting.fa.ru/jour/article/view/500">https://accounting.fa.ru/jour/article/view/500</self-uri><abstract><p>Идея о необходимости информирования общественности о предпринятых компанией мерах в области сохранения окружающей среды и социальной деятельности всемирно признана. Бизнес-сообщество все более вовлекается в деятельность по представлению нефинансовой отчетности, которая, однако, часто не вызывает доверия у разумного пользователя в силу непрозрачности обобщения и произвольного принципа представления. При этом наименее исследованной является один из ее — отчетность по корпоративной социальной ответственности (КСО). Целью исследования является рассмотрение возможности учета и оценки КСО для нефинансовых видов отчетности организаций в контексте достоверности раскрываемой информации, общественных потребностей, способов формирования и заинтересованных сторон. В ходе работы применялись общенаучные методы познания — системный подход, логическое обобщение, лингвистический анализ и гипотезы. Автором показано, что именно отчетность по КСО подвергается значительному риску манипуляций, содержит разнообразие несопоставимых сведений в зависимости от отрасли, характера бизнеса, регуляторных ограничений, положения на рынке и других обстоятельств. Многие признают необходимость участия в подготовке такой отчетности бухгалтерских технологий. При этом у бухгалтерского сообщества не вызывает оптимизма попытка Совета по МСФО создать стандарты по нефинансовой отчетности, используя только финансовый инструментарий, интересный только для инвесторов. При наличии у стейкхолдеров настоящей заинтересованности в раскрытии нефинансовой информации в отчетности необходимо создание действительно реальных учетных систем, позволяющих обобщить необходимую информацию о КСО. Основной вывод направлен на имеющуюся необходимость в выработке государственной политики в этой области и государственного управления на системной основе.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The worldwide recognized the idea of the need to inform the public about the measures taken by the company in environmental conservation and social activities. The business community is increasingly involved in the activity of presenting non-financial reporting. However, it rarely inspires confidence in a reasonable user because of the generalization’s opacity and the arbitrary principle of presentation. At the same time, one of them is the least researched — reporting on corporate social responsibility (CSR). The study’s goal is to consider the accounting possibility and evaluating CSR for non-financial types of reporting of organizations in the reliability’s context of the information disclosed, public needs, methods of formation and stakeholders. The work used general scientific methods of cognition: a systematic approach, logical generalization, linguistic analysis and hypotheses. The author showed it was CSR reporting that had exposed to a significant risk of manipulation, containing a variety of incomparable information that depended on the industry, nature of business, regulatory restrictions, market position and other circumstances. Many recognize the need for participation in preparing such reporting accounting technology. The accounting community is not optimistic about the attempt by the IASB to create standards for non-financial reporting using financial instruments that just investors are interested in. If stakeholders have a genuine interest in disclosing non-financial information in reporting, it is necessary to create really proper accounting systems. That would allow for generalizing the data about CSR. The main conclusion is directed to the existing need for the state policy development in this area and public administration systematically.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>нефинансовая отчетность</kwd><kwd>устойчивое развитие</kwd><kwd>корпоративная социальная ответственность</kwd><kwd>интегрированная отчетность</kwd><kwd>бухгалтерский учет</kwd><kwd>МСФО</kwd><kwd>социальный учет</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>non-financial reporting</kwd><kwd>sustainable development</kwd><kwd>corporate social responsibility</kwd><kwd>integrated reporting</kwd><kwd>accounting</kwd><kwd>IFRS</kwd><kwd>social accounting</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сенаторова Е.А. Нефинансовая отчетность: международный контекст, российская практика. Корпоративные финансы. 2018;12(3):80–92.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Senatorova E.A. Non­financial reporting: international context, Russian practice. Korporativnye finansy = Corporate finance. 2018;12(3):80–92. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Narayanan V., Adams C. A. Transformative change towards sustainability: the interaction between organisational discourses and organisational practicesю. Accounting and Business Research. 2017;47(3):344–368.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Narayanan V., Adams C. A. Transformative change towards sustainability: the interaction between organisational discourses and organisational practices. Accounting and Business Research. 2017;47(3):344–368.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tzu­Yu.T. Influences of Taiwan’s corporate social responsibility report management policy on the information transparency of its capital market. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2022;22(3):487–497.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tzu­Yu.T. Influences of Taiwan’s corporate social responsibility report management policy on the information transparency of its capital market. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2022;22(3):487–497.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lin Yu. Legitimation strategies in corporate discourse: A comparison of UK and Chinese corporate social responsibility reports. Journal of Pragmatics. 2021;177(2):157–169.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lin Yu. Legitimation strategies in corporate discourse: A comparison of UK and Chinese corporate social responsibility reports. Journal of Pragmatics. 2021;177(2):157–169.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kuo­Cheng H., Yu­Chun W. Do reputation concerns motivate voluntary initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters. 2021; 47(1):102611.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuo­Cheng H., Yu­Chun W. Do reputation concerns motivate voluntary initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters. 2021; 47(1):102611.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kallio K. M., Kallio T. J., Grossi G., Engblom J. Institutional logic and scholars’ reactions to performance measurement in universities. Accounting Auditing &amp; Accountability Journal. 34(9):104–130.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kallio K. M., Kallio T. J., Grossi G., Engblom J. Institutional logic and scholars’ reactions to performance measurement in universities. Accounting Auditing &amp; Accountability Journal. 34(9):104–130.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gray R. Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Accounting, Auditing &amp; Accountability Journal. 19(6):793–819.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gray R. Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Accounting, Auditing &amp; Accountability Journal. 2006;19(6):793–819.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dyllick T., Muff K. Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: introducing a typology from business­asusual to true business sustainability. Organization and Environment. 2016;29(2):156–174.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dyllick T., Muff K. Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: introducing a typology from business­asusual to true business sustainability. Organization and Environment. 2016;29(2):156–174.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mavroulidis M., Vouros P., Fotiadis S., Konstantakopoulou F., Fountoulakis G., Nikolaou I. et al. Occupational health and safety of multinational construction companies through evaluation of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Safety Research. 2022;(81):45–54.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mavroulidis M., Vouros P., Fotiadis S., Konstantakopoulou F., Fountoulakis G., Nikolaou I. et al. Occupational health and safety of multinational construction companies through evaluation of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Safety Research. 2022;(81):45–54.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kahloul I., Sbai H., Grira J. Does corporate social responsibility reporting improve financial performance? The moderating role of board diversity and gender composition. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 2022;(84):305–314.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kahloul I., Sbai H., Grira J. Does corporate social responsibility reporting improve financial performance? The moderating role of board diversity and gender composition. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2022;(84):305–314.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Girella L., Zambon S., Rossi P. Board characteristics and the choice between sustainability and integrated reporting: a European analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research. 2021;30(3):562–596.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Girella L., Zambon S., Rossi P. Board characteristics and the choice between sustainability and integrated reporting: a European analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research. 2021;30(3):562–596.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">De Villiers Ch., Hsiao P­Ch. Zambon S., Magnaghi E. Sustainability, non­financial, integrated, and value reporting (extended external reporting): a conceptual framework and an agenda for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research. 2022;30(3):453–471.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">De Villiers Ch., Hsiao P­Ch. Zambon S., Magnaghi E. Sustainability, non­financial, integrated, and value reporting (extended external reporting): a conceptual framework and an agenda for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research. 2022;30(3):453–471.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">De Villiers C., La Torre M., Molinari M. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) past, present and future: critical reflections and a research agenda on sustainability reporting (standard­setting). Pacific Accounting Review. 2022;34(5):728–747.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">De Villiers C., La Torre M., Molinari M. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) past, present and future: critical reflections and a research agenda on sustainability reporting (standard­setting). Pacific Accounting Review. 2022;34(5):728–747.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Adams C.A., Mueller F. Academics and policymakers at odds: the case of the IFRS Foundation Trustees’ consultation paper on sustainability reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2022;13(6):1310–1333.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Adams C.A., Mueller F.Academics and policymakers at odds: the case of the IFRS Foundation Trustees’ consultation paper on sustainability reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2022;13(6):1310–1333.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beske F., Haustein E. and Lorson P.C. Materiality analysis in sustainability and integrated reports. 2020. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2020;11(1):162–186.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beske F., Haustein E. and Lorson P.C. Materiality analysis in sustainability and integrated reports. 2020. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2020;11(1):162–186.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мельник М.В. Система показателей для интегрированной отчетности. Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения. 2019;15(3):58–64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Melnik M.V. System of indicators for integrated reporting. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya = Economics and management: problems, solutions. 2019;15(3):58–64. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Малиновская Н.В. Трансформация глобального регулирования нефинансовой отчетности. Экономические науки. 2022;(207):114–116.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malinovskaya N.V. Transformation of global regulation of non­financial reporting. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Economic sciences. 2022;(207):114–116. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Алборов Р.А., Концевая С.М., Козменкова С.В. Интегрированная отчетность в сельском хозяйстве: состав и проблемы внедрения. Международный бухгалтерский учет. 2018;21(4):413–428.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alborov R.A., Kontsevaya S. M., Kozmenkova S.V. Integrated reporting in agriculture: composition and problems of implementation. Mezhdunarodnyj buhgalterskij uchet = International Accounting. 2018;21(4):413– 428. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Серебрякова Т.Ю., Кондрашова О.Р. Управленческий учет информации по сегментам как часть интегрированного учета. Международный бухгалтерский учет. 2015;8(350):2–16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Serebryakova T. Yu., Kondrashova O.R. Management accounting of segment information as part of integrated accounting. Mezhdunarodnyj buhgalterskij uchet = International accounting. 2015;8(350):2–16. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Булыга Р.П., Сафонова И.В. Стандарты нефинансовой отчетности для публичных компаний: тренды развития. Самоуправление. 2022;3(131):31–34.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bulyga R.P., Safonova I.V. Standards of non­financial reporting for public companies: development trends. Samoupravlenie = Self-management. 2022;3(131):1–34. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Свешникова О.Н. Нефинансовая отчетность как главное направление развития российской корпоративной отчетности. Вестник Волжского университета им. В.Н. Татищева. 2016;2(2):10–115.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sveshnikova O. N. Non­financial reporting as the main direction of development of Russian corporate reporting. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva = Bulletin of the V.N. Tatishchev Volga State University. 2016;2(2):110–115. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
