Synthesis in the context of accounting
https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2023-10-5-14-21
Abstract
In modern conditions, the problem of maintaining the stability and continuity of the company’s activities is becoming particularly relevant. The fulfillment of the tasks depends on the ability of the enterprise to quickly adapt to the changing conditions in which it operates, but this alone is no longer enough. In strategic planning, the main role in ensuring the sustainability and continuity of the activities of business entities is played by the ability of the management system to predict the situation for the long term and respond to it in a timely manner. The purpose of the research was to reveal the role and significance of the synthesis method in accounting, namely the ability of accounting to synthesize forecast indicators illustrating the transformation of capital from one form to another as a result of the implementation of certain business processes.As a result of the research carried out, the article formulates a new approach to the essence of the synthesis method in accounting, justifies the need to expand the composition of the elements of the accounting method and include in it the technique of “prototyping accounting models”. The prototype of a working model of the accounting system of the enterprise makes it possible to form information in the context of individual business processes and economic activity as a whole, as well as to predict or forecast various options for the organization.
About the Authors
N. A. BoreikoBelarus
Nadezhda A. Boreiko — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Accounting, Finance, Logistics and Management,
Novopolotsk.
I. V. Matsiush
Belarus
Igor V. Matsiush — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Accounting, Finance, Logistics and Management,
Novopolotsk.
References
1. Sokolov Ya.V. Accounting — cheerful science. Moscow: 1C-Publishing; 2011. 640 p. (In Russ.).
2. Blatov N.A. Fundamentals of general accounting in connection with commercial, industrial and estimated accounting. Leningrad: Economic education; 1926. 535 p. (In Russ.).
3. Weizman N.R. Course of balance studies. Moscow: Centrosoyuz; 1928. 282 p. (In Russ.).
4. Galagan A.M. Bookkeeping in its historical development. Moscow: Leningrad: State Publishing House; 1927. 170 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kolvakh O.I., Kalmykova O. Ya. Double entry as a universal method of modeling economic relations. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Auditing and financial analysis. 2008;(2);49–64. (In Russ.).
6. Kryukova L.I. Modeling of accounting. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody = Economics and mathematical methods. 1982;18(1):94–104. (In Russ.).
7. Sherr I.F. Accounting and balance Moscow: Economic life; 1925. 575 p. (In Russ.).
8. Schmalenbach E. Accounting plans: the experience of unified classification of accounts of industrial enterprises. Leningrad: Economic education; 1928. 94 p. (In Russ.).
9. Anthony R.N. Accounting: situations and examples. Moscow: Finance and Statistics; 1996. 557 p. (In Russ.).
10. Pankov D.A., Matyush I.V. Accounting analysis of the effectiveness of enterprise modernization. Minsk: BSATU; 2017. 200 p. (In Russ.).
11. Givón T. Prototype: Between Plato and Wittgenstein. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1986. pp. 77–102.
Review
For citations:
Boreiko N.A., Matsiush I.V. Synthesis in the context of accounting. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2023;10(5):14-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2023-10-5-14-21