Normative Production Accounting in the Digital Economy: Issues and Solutions
https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2018-5-3-82-93
Abstract
In the digital economy the task of real-time monitoring of the state of production chains creates an objective need to restore normative economy. Detailed study of normative production accounting becomes particularly relevant and significant. The aim of the study was to classify the issues of normative production accounting and to justify the ways of solving them for further standardization and regulation of analytical procedures. Empirical methods such as observation, comparison, induction and deduction were used in the study. The article reports the results of the retrospective analysis of the provisions and practices of the normative method as well as the state of the deployment of the production operations and chains in the current context. It was determined that the formula for the normative method requires modification while the algorithm for allocation of indirect costs requires justification and interpretation. The study concludes that theoretical and methodological provisions of the normative method should be developed regarding the business processes. The set of characteristics which determines competitiveness of business processes was argued as the accounting object. Basing on this it was proven that there is need for further development of national standards for statistics, metrology, accounting as well as for the use of a common classification of industries and typology of production.
About the Author
M. V. Polulekh
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mila V. Polulekh — Can. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of Accounting, Analysis and Auditing Department
Moscow
References
1. Melnik M. V. A new look at assessing the sustainability of the economic entity. Transport business in Russia. 2015;(2):39–42. (In Russ.).
2. Melnik M. V. Major factors of modern economy sustainability. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, 2015;(4):16–22. (In Russ.).
3. Emerson H. The twelve principles of efficiency. Moscow: Economika; 1972. 223 p. (In Russ.).
4. Harrison D. C. Standard cost. The system of standard cost accounting. Moscow: Special agency Orguchet; 1933. 204 р. (In Russ.).
5. Zhebrak M. Kh., Kryukov G. G. Normative production accounting. Moscow: TSUNHU GOSPLANA USSR, Soyuzorguchet; 1934. 59 p. (In Russ.).
6. Ivanov N. N. Normative production accounting. Moscow: Gosfinizdat; 1956. 218 p. (In Russ.).
7. Poklad I. I. Accounting, calculation and analysis the cost of industrial products. Moscow: Finansi; 1966. 255p. (In Russ.).
8. Chumachenko N. G. Normative Production Accounting in Instrument. Moscow: Mashinostroenie; 1966. 207 p. (In Russ.).
9. Karakoz I. I., Savichev P. I. Questions of theory and practice of operational accounting. Moscow: Finansi; 1972. 208 p. (In Russ.).
10. Demina I. D. Opportunities of applying system “standard-cost” in companies with state participation and enterprises-monopolists. Auditjournal. 2017;(3):45–57.(In Russ.).
11. Solomennikova E. A., Prischenko E. A., Gurin V. V. Improvement of Normative Method of Accounting and Monitoring Costs. World of Economics and Management. 2017;17(2):121–129. (In Russ.).
12. Budovich Yu. I. Economic theory about need to create a single accounting science. All for Accountant. 2017;(1):33–44. (In Russ.).
13. Barilenko V. I. Business-analysis as a tool for sustainable development of economic entities. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2014;(1):25–31. (In Russ.).
14. Melnik M. V. Development of a Balanced Scorecard for Sustainable Business Management. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2015;(1):34–44. (In Russ.).
15. Vakhrushina M. A. Revisiting the relationship of accounting and statistics. International accounting. 2017;20(11):612–631. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Polulekh M.V. Normative Production Accounting in the Digital Economy: Issues and Solutions. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2018;5(3):82-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2018-5-3-82-93
Views:
741
.png)
.png)
Email this article 
