Accounting of Economic Content and Legal Form of Lease Relations in Timber Logging
https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2020-7-1-58-68
Abstract
Qualitative representation in the accounting space of economic and legal characteristics of various events and objects is currently the problem that has not fully been resolved yet, despite the action in Russian and international accounting practice of the principle of priority of content over the form. The article is devoted to improving the veracity of accounting information about forest resources used in the logging business on lease terms. The methodological basis of the study was the conceptual framework of IFRS, the provisions of Russian accounting standards, as well as the postulates about accounting as a means of modeling the economic activity of any organization and the mandatory relationship of the form and content. The use of methods of historical actualization, analysis, comparison, synthesis, modeling, analogy and generalization provided an opportunity to develop an approach that allows you to reach a compromise in the accounting reflection of the economic content and legal form of lease relations in the logging sector. The result of the study was a refined accounting interpretation of the economic essence of the lease agreement for logging. The theoretical significance of the study is to justify the need to re-qualify the relationship between the state and the logger. The practical application of the proposed recommendations will improve the quality of the indicators generated by the accounting system, provided to all categories of users.
About the Author
L. G. Ulyasheva
Pitirim Sorokin Syktyvkar State University
Russian Federation
Larisa G. Ulyasheva — senior lecturer, Department of Accounting and Auditing, Institute of Economics and Finance
Russian Federation
Larisa G. Ulyasheva — senior lecturer, Department of Accounting and Auditing, Institute of Economics and Finance
References
1. Abdikeev N. M., Bogachev Y. S., Trifonov P. V., Moreva E. L., Sopilko N. Y., Scherbakova N. S. The calculation of the cost of intangible assets based on intellectual property. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET). 2018;9(7):1737–1748.
2. Glaum M., Baetge J., Grothe A., Oberdörster T. Introduction of international accounting standards, disclosure quality and accuracy of analysts’ earnings forecasts. European Accounting Review. 2013;22(1):79–116. DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2011.558301
3. Hales J. The future of accounting is now. CPA Journal. 2018;88(7):6–9.
4. Baranov P. P., Ustinova Ya. I. Information limitations of the Russian concept of business reputation accounting and the vector of its development. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2016;3(6):38–50. (In Russ.).
5. Kogdenko V. G., Mel’nik M. V. Intellectual capital and its role in assessing the sustainability of an economic entity. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2016;3(6):28–37. (In Russ.).
6. Kuvaldina T. B. The procedure for correcting errors in the financial statements. Vse dlya bukhgaltera = Everything for an Accountant. 2013;275(5):17–24. (In Russ.).
7. Safonova I. V., Silchenko A. D. Falsification of financial statements: Сoncept and tools of identification. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2018;5(6):37–49. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2408–9303–2018–5–6–37–49
8. Polisyuk G. B., Korchagina L. M. Accounting (financial) reporting: The problem of identifying information distortion. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting. 2013;250(4):44–52. (In Russ.).
9. Mizikovskii I. E., Bazhenov A. A. Accounting (financial) reporting as a tool to ensure transparency of economic activities of economic entities. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2016;(2):69–77. (In Russ.).
10. Pyatov M. L. Evolution of accounting methodology within the company’s balance sheet model. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriya 5: Ekonomika. = Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Series 5: Economics. 2014;(4):56–75. (In Russ.).
11. Petrova A. N. Investor-oriented financial statements. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel’stvo = Russian Entrepreneurship. 2012;202(4):95–100. (In Russ.).
12. Lukanina A. V. Analysis of basic categories of IFRS within the principle of priority of the contents over the form. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting. 2015;374(32):28–40. (In Russ.).
13. Pyatov M. L. The principle of the substance priority over the form in Russia. BUKh.1S. 2006;(11):12–13. (In Russ.).
14. Zvyagin S. A. Veiling and falsification of financial statements. Bukhgalter i zakon = Accountant and Law. 2005;74(2):5–10. (In Russ.).
15. Lugovskoi D. V., Olomskaya E. V., Molodtsova Yu. N. Priority of economic content over legal form: Theory and practice. Vse dlya bukhgaltera = Everything for an Accountant. 2007;205(13):47–53. (In Russ.).
16. Morozova E. V. The lease agreement of the forest area in logging as an object of financial accounting. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting. 2012;225(27):31–41. (In Russ.).
17. Kulikova L. I. Veiling and falsification of financial statements: historical and evolutionary aspect. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting. 2011;164(14):56–68. (In Russ.).
18. Davydova O. A. Professional judgment as an element of the accounting regulatory system. Diskussiya = Discussion. 2017;84(10):16–22. (In Russ.).
19. Lianskii M. E. Analysis of prospects of professional judgment of the accountant. Audit i finansovyi analiz = Auditing and financial analysis. 2006;(4):14–19. (In Russ.).
20. Gray J. A. The Canadian experience of the organization of forest concessions. Ustoichivoe lesopol’zovanie = Sustainable Forest Management. 2004;3(1):28–35. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ulyasheva L.G. Accounting of Economic Content and Legal Form of Lease Relations in Timber Logging. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2020;7(1):58-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2020-7-1-58-68
Views:
581
.png)
.png)
Email this article 
