Preview

Accounting. Analysis. Auditing

Advanced search

The Peculiarities of the Methodology of Teaching Accounting by G.A. Bakhchisaraytsev — the Representative of the Moscow Accounting School

https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2018-5-5-43-53

Abstract

The progressive development of accounting in both theoretical and practical terms has an extremely complex historical and evolutionary character. At the same time, domestic periods have always been characterized by periods of both the strengthening of original national principles and their weakening. Therefore, it is very important to achieve harmonization of these separate aspects of comprehension of accounting science, allowing simultaneously to take into account not only national economic interests, but also to use the best world experience. The presented article is just considering these features on the example of the scientifc and teaching creativity of one of the outstanding representatives of the Moscow accounting school, G.A. Bakhchisaraytsev. Here it is necessary to take into account a different understanding of the accounting methodology that existed at that time in Russia. The generalizations and conclusions presented in the article make it possible to ensure a holistic perception of the preparation of accounting personnel, to prove the correctness of the consistent study of thematic materials that allow accounting to be considered as an informational reflection of a single reproduction cycle with the access to the system of the most important fnancial and result and exchange indicators. This approach is widely used in modern methods of teaching accounting. In addition, it is necessary to note the severity of the problem of training highly professional accountants, and in this respect, referring to the experience of G.A. Bakhchisaraytsev, we should remember the need for a high degree of responsibility for training accounting personnel. It emphasizes the exceptional importance of the continuity of training in accounting, including through self-education, which allows you to expand the range of professional knowledge, and thus increase the credibility and importance of the accounting profession.

About the Authors

G. V. Mikhailova
North-Caucasus Federal University
Russian Federation

Galina V. Mikhailova — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Professor of Department “Accounting, analysis and auditing”

Stavropol



E. V. Potekhina
North-Caucasus Federal University
Russian Federation

Ekaterina V. Potekhina — Cand. Sci. (Ped.), Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Stavropol State Pedagogical Institute

Stavropol



References

1. Anderson M. An analysis of the frst ten volumes of research in accounting, business and fnancial History. Accounting, business & fnancial history. 2002;12(1):1–24.

2. Parker RH. The scope of accounting history: A note. Abacus. 1993;29(1):106–110.

3. Carmona S. Accounting history research and its diffusion in an international context. Accounting History. 2004;9(3):7–23.

4. Crowther D. and Carter C. Legitimating irrelevance: management education in higher education institutions. The international journal of educational management. 2002;16(6):268–278.

5. Wells M. What is wrong with accounting education? Working paper. Accounting research centre, university of Sydney. 1987;(22):4.

6. Simon R. The University: A place to think? The corporate university: culture and pedagogy in the new millennium. Edited by Giroux H. and Myrsiades K. Lanham Md.: Rowman & Littlefeld Publishers, 2001:45–56.

7. James K. A critical theory and postmodernist approach to the teaching of accounting theory. Critical perspectives on accounting. 2008;19(5):643–676.

8. Evstaf’eva E.M., Bogataya I. N. The study of modern Russian tendencies of development of accounting and reporting in the Russian Federation. Mezhdunarodnyj buhgalterskij uchet = International Accounting. 2013;(25):2–17. (In Russ.).

9. Murav’eva L.A. The State of Russian fnancial thought in the second half of XIX—early XX century. Finansy i kredit = Finance and credit. 2013;2(530):71–80. (In Russ.).

10. Cygankov K. Yu. Balance theory in Russia. Anthology of Accounting Thought from the History of Accounting. Moscow: Economist; 2006. 196 p. (In Russ.).

11. Popov N.U. Accounting of city and county governments and other institutions obliged to keep a detailed account of the execution of estimated appointments. St. Petersburg: kN. SKL. Commercial. lit., 1908. 256 p. (In Russ.).

12. Bahchisarajcev G.A. First lessons in accounting on basis of my balance theory. Moscow: Published by the author, 1926. 32 p. (In Russ.).

13. Bahchisarajcev G.A. (under the pseudonym Arsen’ev G.) How to study accounting? Thoughts about the law of double entry and the balance. Moscow: Type. Saprykina P.T.; 1908. 19 p. (In Russ.).

14. Medvedev M. Yu., Nazarov D.V. History of Russian accounting. Moscow: Accounting; 2007. 436 p. (In Russ.).

15. Kostrikov S. P. Russian bourgeoisie and commercial education. The development of ideas, the goals and objectives of the Department. Moscow: Publishing house of GUU; 2015. 136 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Mikhailova G.V., Potekhina E.V. The Peculiarities of the Methodology of Teaching Accounting by G.A. Bakhchisaraytsev — the Representative of the Moscow Accounting School. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2018;5(5):43-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2018-5-5-43-53

Views: 627


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2408-9303 (Print)
ISSN 2619-130X (Online)