Prospects for Innovative Development of International Trade Cooperation for the Population Economic Security

The paper reveals the analysis of modern trends of increasing global risks, the preservation of dangers and threats of natural, man-made and bio-social disasters, the emergence of new challenges on a global scale that can lead to global crisis situations. The methodological base of the study includes theories of constructing a new system of economic interstate humanitarian interaction. In this case, there have been applied analysis methods and synthesis, analogies, observations and expert assessments. The study considered the experience of creating institutional joint companies in public security at the international level. There was formed a mechanism as well as methodological recommendations have been prepared for innovative development in the field of crisis management and implementation of the framework program for disaster risk reduction. The analysis of the stages of building an international humanitarian response system with different countries is carried out. The directions of innovative development of international cooperation for the purpose of economic security of the population are proposed. The study of the experience of creating institutional joint organizations allowed to propose an economic model that meets the principles and spirit of international law. The developed recommendations will provide the Russian Federation with an innovative and technological breakthrough in the international humanitarian sphere. The results of the research can be used by public authorities in the formation and implementation of national international policiy for the development of humanitarian bilateral and multilateral cooperation in the field of humanitarian projects, economic security of the population and the prevention of disasters and crises.

1. Tihomirov S. International response to the global increase in economic damage from natural disasters. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2017;61(11)93–101. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131–2227–2017–61–11–93–101

2. Ruban D.A. Regional innovation systems and economic security of the country. In: Proc. Int. sci.-prac. conf. “National Security: Strategic Priorities and Support System” (Moscow, April 28, 2016). Moscow: FSBEI HPE “Perm State National Research University”; 2016:304–309. (In Russ.).

3. Kuvsinov A.V. Activities of specialized organizations of the UN and IGO on disaster management at the beginning of the XXI century. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: International Relations. 2016;16(1):114–123. (In Russ.).

4. Kharitonova E.M. Humanitarian emergency relief in the UN system: Challenges and risks. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti = Paths to Peace and Security. 2018;54(1):239–248. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/2307–1494–2018– 1–239–248

5. Buletti D. Swiss experience in the international humanitarian operation “Focus”. In: Proc. Int. sci. conf. “Problems of legal and economic methods of preventing and minimizing damage that arose in emergency situations” (Moscow, April 25–26, 2000). Moscow: VNII GOCHS; 2000:270–276. (In Russ.).

6. Goss K. Cooperation of the Federal Agency for emergency situations (FEMA) with the EMERCOM of Russia. Legal aspects of bilateral cooperation. In: Proc. Int. sci. conf. “Problems of legal and economic methods of preventing and minimizing damage that arose in emergency situations” (Moscow, April 25–26, 2000). Moscow: VNII GOCHS; 2000:239–244. (In Russ.).

7. Brazhnikov Yu.V., Kakusha V.N. et al. The lessons of tsunami. Moscow: Department of International Activities of the EMERCOM of Russia; 2005. 45 p. (In Russ.).

8. Ivanova N.I. et al. Sectoral innovation policy instruments. Moscow: IMEMO; 2016. 161 p. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/978–5–9535–0478–2

9. El-Erian M. Navigating the new normal in industrial countries. Washington: Per Jacobsson Foundation; 2010. 37 p.

10. Puchkov V.A. Strategies of state regulation of innovative development of the population’s life safety system. Moscow: Antares; 2019. 431 p. (In Russ.).

11. Kondrat’ev V.B. New stage of globalization: Features and prospects. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2018;62(6)5–17. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131– 2227–2018–62–6–5–17

12. Stiglitz J.E. The great divide: Unequal societies and what we can do about them. New York: W.W. Norton and Company; 2015. 464 p.

13. Dynkin A.A. The world of 2035. Global outlook. Moscow: Magistr; 2017. 352 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978–5–9776– 0458–1.

14. Subramanian A., Kessler M. The hyperglobalization of trade and its future. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper. 2013;(13–6). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2297994

15. Koval’chuk Yu.A., Stepnov I. M. Research of the technological future’s uncertainty. Vestnik MGIMOUniversiteta = MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2019;12(6):214–224. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24833/2071– 8160–2019–6–69–214–224