Methodology for Quantifying the Tax Burden in the Russian Economy
https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2022-9-2-6-19
Abstract
The tax burden on the real sector of the economy and the income of the population in any country is the most important indicator of the prospects for business development and the attractiveness of living in it. Economic theory offers various interpretations of the category of tax burden and methodological approaches to the quantitative measurement of its magnitude. Its calculation at the micro, meso and macro levels today is contradictory to determine the indicator that is at the basis of the relative intensity value (as tax burden presentation): GDP, the total turnover of organizations and individual entrepreneurs for the current (reporting) year, revenue from sales at the institutional level, profits from sales and financial and economic activities before taxation, etc. The author considered the category of tax flow, built its index model, based on recommended using the dynamics index the tax burden assessment at all levels of analysis variable tax burden with the construction of factor indices of structural shifts and changes in the tax base, rates, benefits, prices and the range of sold products. The research considered the development of an information-logical scheme for implementing a flow model of the tax burden for various levels of analysis. Also, the author presented the results of a structural and dynamic analysis of the magnitude and sectoral structure of the tax burden in Russia for 2006–2020 and made forecasts of its level up to 2022 research development prospects.
About the Author
L. Yu. Arkhangel’skaya
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lyubov’ Yu. Arkhangel’skaya - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Accounting, Analysis and Audit
Moscow
References
1. Chernik D. G., Pavlova L. P., Dadashev A. Z., Knyazev V. G., Chipurenko E. V. Tax burden of an enterprise: analysis, calculation, management. M.: Tax Bulletin; 2008. 464 p. (In Russ.).
2. Amelina E. A. Tax burden of enterprises: concept, calculation methods and optimization directions. Kaluga economic bulletin = Kaluzhskij ekonomicheskij vestnik. 2020;(2):68–72. (In Russ.).
3. Moroz V. V., Grechina A. I. Analysis of methods for calculating the tax burden, features of their practical application. Financial life = Finansovaya zhizn’. 2018;(1):57–60. (In Russ.).
4. Arkhangelskaya L. Yu. The practice of applying factorial index analysis in the management accounting system for topographic and geodetic enterprises. News of higher educational institutions. Geodesy and aerial photography = Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Geodeziya i aerofotos»emka. 2012;(4):106–111. (In Russ.).
5. Arkhangelskaya L. Yu. Quantitative assessment of the tax burden — an analytical tool for business security. Collection of articles based on the results of the VI International Interuniversity Scientific and Practical Conference «Accounting, analysis and audit: new challenges in ensuring security and responsibility to business» (November 7, 2019). Moscow: RUSAYNS; 2020. 486 p. (In Russ.).
6. Arkhangelskaya L. Yu. Statistical modeling of the tax burden of institutional units as a tool for business analytics. Economics and Management: Problems and Solutions = Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy i resheniya. 2021;2(2):83–86. (In Russ.).
7. Grabova O. N., Suglobov A. E. Study of the tax burden in the context of digitalization of the economy. Economy. Taxes. Right = Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. 2018;1(4):141–151. (In Russ.).
8. Radosteva M. V. Tax burden and methods of its assessment in modern conditions. Scientific statements of the Belgorod State University. Series: economics. Informatics = Nauchnye vedomosti belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: ekonomika. Informatika. 2017;258(9):71–76. (In Russ.).
9. Tikhonova A. V. Global taxation: statistical aspects (on the example of agriculture). Food policy and security = Prodovol’stvennaya politika i bezopasnost’. 2016;3(1):19–40. (In Russ.).
10. Siegel E. Practical business statistics. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Williams; 2008; 1099 p. (In Russ.).
11. Ryabtsev V. M., Chudilin G. I. Regional statistics. Moscow: MFA; 2001. (In Russ.).
12. Ranadive V. Foresight: A new evolutionary proactive business model. Translation from English. Moscow: Eksmo; 2008. 240 p. (In Russ.).
13. Eckerson W. W. Dashboards as a management tool: Key performance indicators, performance monitoring, results evaluation. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Alpina Business Books; 2007. 417 p. (In Russ.).
14. Kimball R., Reeves L., Ross M., Thornthwaite W. The Date Warehouse Lifecycle Toolkit. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1998. 780 p.
15. Eckerson W. W. Performance Management Strategies. How to create and deploy effective metries, TDWI Best Practices Report. First Quarter 2009. URL: https://www.spendit.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/TDWI_Performance-Management-Strategies.pdf.
Review
For citations:
Arkhangel’skaya L.Yu. Methodology for Quantifying the Tax Burden in the Russian Economy. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2022;9(2):6-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2022-9-2-6-19
Views:
401
.png)
.png)
Email this article 
