Comparative analysis of tax regimes Effectiveness in oil Production
https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2022-9-3-39-51
Abstract
The paper deals with the problems of the method of comparative analysis of the tax regimes in the field of oil production in order to create instruments for making operational decisions on its basis by oil and gas companies. The author shows that for hard-to-recover reserves, when reducing coefficients apply to the MET rate (for the period of their validity), the basic taxation regime is more effective than the AIT regime. It also substantiates the expediency of conducting a comparative analysis of the tax regimes used in the production of hydrocarbons using the Discounted Petroleum Taxes (DPT) indicator, which reflects the discounted amount of taxes (in constant prices per 1 ton of oil) in periods corresponding to the validity of project documents for the development deposits and the term of the license for the use of subsoil. The author proposed the approach to a comparative assessment of the effectiveness subsoil plots to the AIT regime at increasing the efficiency and validity of tax planning in the oil and gas industry. The research used such general scientific principles and methods as systematization, analysis (including structural-dynamic), as well as deduction.
About the Author
G. S. Dyachkov
Research-consulting company ECAP LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Georgy S. Dyachkov — Senior analysis
Moscow
References
1. Johnston D., Johnston D. Fundamental Petroleum Fiscal Considerations. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies; 2015. 14 p. URL: https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Fundamental-Petroleum-Fiscal-Considerations.pdf
2. Lund D. State participation and taxation in Norwegian petroleum: Lessons for others? Energy Strategy Reviews 2014;3(4):49–54. URL: https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/sv/oekonomi/ECON4925/h16/pensumliste/lund_esr_14.pdf
3. Bjerkedal N., Johnsen T. The Petroleum Tax System Revisited. Petroleum Industry Regulation within Stable States. London: Routledge Revivals; 2017. 192 p. (157–175 pp.).
4. Osmundsen P., Lovas K. Trends and Trade-Offs in Petroleum Tax Design International. Journal of Global Energy Issues. 2009;36(1):42–60.
5. Ripley P. The Oil and Gas Taxation Regime: A ‘Smash and Grab’ Approach? URL: https://www.abdn.ac.uk/law/documents/Vol2July2011.pdf
6. Johnson D. Analysis of exploration economics, risks and agreements in the international oil and gas industry. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Olymp-business; 2005. 451 p. (In Russ.).
7. Bobyleva A. Z., Zhavoronkova E. N., Lvova O. A. Assessment of oil sector taxation models in Russia and abroad. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya. 6: Ekonomika = Bulletin of Moscow University. Series. 6: Economy. 2015;(5):22–45. (In Russ.).
8. Vygon G. V., Ezhov S. S., Belova M. A., Kolbikova E. S., Pigarev D. Yu. Russian oil industry: Results and prospects. Study. VYGON Consulting: 2016. 79 p. URL: https://vygon.consulting/products/issue-598/ (In Russ.).
9. Goncharenko L. I. To the question of the conceptual apparatus of tax administration. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Taxes and taxation. 2010;(2):17–24. (In Russ.).
10. Katysheva E. G. Taxation of financial results in the field of oil production: Mezhdunarodnyj nauchnoissledovatel’skij zhurnal = Analysis of implementation options. International research journal. 2016;46(4–1):32–34. (In Russ.).
11. Kuznetsov S. Hopes for NDD. Oil and capital (online edition). 07.09.2020. URL: https://oilcapital.ru/article/general/09–07–2020/nadezhdy-na-ndd (In Russ.).
12. Roshchupkina V. V. Updating taxation of profits in the oil and gas industry: Prospects for value added tax. Mezhdunarodnyj buhgalterskij uchet = International accounting. 2018;21(8):917–926. URL: http://213.226.126.9/ ia/2018/ia08/ia0818–917.pdf. (In Russ.).
13. Ezhov S. S. Investments in exploration — t hink about the future. Neft’ i kapital (internet-izdanie) = Oil and capital (online edition). November 2, 2020. URL: https://oilcapital.ru/comment/sergey-ezhov/02–12–2020/sergey-ezhovinvestitsii-v-grr-dumat-o-buduschem. (In Russ.).
14. Zuev A. A. Introduction of a tax on additional income from hydrocarbon production in the Russian Federation: A twenty-year journey. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Taxes and taxation 2019;(4)11–23. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=29577. (In Russ.).
15. Kondukov P., Khasanova L. What is the NDD preparing for us? Neft’ i kapital (internet-izdanie) = Oil and capital (online edition). 14.03.2018. URL: https://oilcapital.ru/article/general/14–03–2018/chto-nam-gotovitndd?id=chto-nam-gotovit-ndd&published_date=14–03–2018&type=AnalyticItem. (In Russ.).
16. Zubareva V. D., Sarkisov A. S., Andreev A. F. Feasibility study of oil and gas projects: Efficiency and risks. Moscow: Publishing Center of the Russian State University of Oil and Gas (NRU) named after I. M. Gubkin; 2018. 278 p. (In Russ.).
17. Zubareva V. D. Financial and economic analysis of design solutions in the oil and gas industry. Moscow: Oil and gas; 2005. 379 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Dyachkov G.S. Comparative analysis of tax regimes Effectiveness in oil Production. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2022;9(3):39-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2022-9-3-39-51
Views:
368
.png)
.png)
Email this article 
