Business Audit in ESG format: Up-Growth of the Corporate Reporting Verification Methodology

The paper continues the series of authors’ publications on the problem of developing the concept of business audit in sustainable development and ESG transformation. The object of the study is the modern international and Russian practice of verifying public ESG reporting by leading companies. The study’s task is to develop a methodology to confirm its reliability as the area for developing business audit in these conditions. As a result of the study, the authors have identified a trend for the auditors of the world’s leading countries to express an opinion on the reliability of ESG reporting with the provision of reasonable assurance to interested users, in contrast to Russian practice, in which thereare currently no such precedents. There have been determined directions for improving the procedure for confirming the reliability of public (including non-financial) reporting and delimited by the horizon of their practical implementation. The authors substantiated the necessity of introducing a requirement for a mandatory audit of non-financial information in corporate reporting. Also, they gave a comparative description of the two tracks of the practical implementation in the application of this requirement: the introduction of a mandatory rule for the predominant expression of reasonable assurance when auditors perform assignments to confirm the reliability of all types of non-financial reporting; extending the requirements of auditing standards, requiring auditors to express reasonable assurance on all corporate reporting. The authors have developed proposals to correct certain aspects of the existing methodology for the audit of financial statements in relation to the process of verification of non-financial information in corporate reporting. The results got will expand audit practice in the implementation’s context of the concept of sustainable development and implementing ESG principles. The study may interest national regulators, professional communities, as well as investors and financial market participants.

1. Chen Z., Xie G. ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2022;83(C):102291.

2. Wu B., Fu Y., Wang Z., Liu X., Wang Z., Li B., Huang G.O. Consortium blockchain-enabled smart ESG reporting platform with token-based incentives for corporate crowdsensing. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2022;172(1):108456.

3. Friede G., Busch, T., Bassen A. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2015;5(4):210–233.

4. Fatemi A., Glaum M., Kaiser S. ESG performance and financial value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal. 2017;(38):45–64.

5. Bulyga R.P., Melnik M.V. Business audit. Practice and problems of development. Monograph. Moscow: UnityDana; 2013. 263 p. (In Russ.).

6. Bulyga R. P., Safonova I. V. Audit of business: review of current standards in the focus of ESG regulation. Auditor =Auditor. 2022;8(7):23–31. (In Russ.).

7. Bulyga R. P., Safonova I. V. Business audit in ESG format: dialectic of development of basic categories of verification. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2022;9(4):05–20. (In Russ.).

8. Skobarev V. Yu. FBK. Non-financial reporting 2022: preparation and validation (online). 31.03.2022. URL: http://media.rspp.ru/document/1/1/0/100bcd88f77bc1400c4d78a7cc4f5852.pdf / (In Russ.).

9. Bogataya I.N., Evstafyeva E.M. Study of the practice of confirmation (certification) of non-financial reporting. Vestnik Altajskoj akademii ekonomiki i prava = Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2022;8(2):171–176. (In Russ.).

10. Kaspina R.G., Samoilova N. O. Audit of non-financial information. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2020;7(4):71–80. (In Russ.).

11. Kozhukhova V.V. Audit of non- financial reporting in the context of the formation of a system of economic security of enterprises. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Samara State University of Economics. 2020;11(193):76–81. (In Russ.).

12. Limperg T., Baranov P. P., Shaposhnikov A.A., Amanzholova B.A. et al. The theory of inspirational trust or auditor’s social responsibility. Monograph. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Auditor; 2017:95. (In Russ.).

13. Shcherbinina A.G. Audit of non- financial indicators of integrated reporting: recent trends in the services market Russian Economic Bulletin. 2020;3(4):200–205. (In Russ.).

14. Lobasheva A.A. Environmental audit of non-financial reporting. Evrazijskoe nauchnoe ob»edinenie = Eurasian Scientific Association. 2020;2–3(60):180–183. (In Russ.).

15. Selezneva A.V. Independent verification of non-financial reporting. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit statements. 2016;(4):31–42. (In Russ.).

16. Manaicheva A. P. Independent assessment of non-financial reporting. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika = Economics and Business: theory and practice. 2020;5–3(63):93–95. (In Russ.).

17. Abdullin D.M., Demina I.D. Features of determining the level of materiality when planning and conducting an audit of an organization’s public non-financial reporting. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2019;6(2):87–94. (In Russ.).