Preview

Accounting. Analysis. Auditing

Advanced search

Discounting of Deferred Taxes: Theoretical Aspects

https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2023-10-3-21-32

Abstract

The objective of the study is to justify the prohibition of discounting deferred taxes by harmonising their essence with the concept of fair value. The work is theoretical in nature, standard scientific methods have been used, including the collection of theoretical information, formalisation, as well as analysis, synthesis, observation, and comparison. This article summarizes the results of research in the field of deferred tax discounting over the past 60 years and attempts to reconcile the essence of it with the concepts of fair value. The issues of deferred tax discounting have long been the subject of scientific research and still remain unresolved. In the second half of the twentieth century, the key problem was the choice of an acceptable discount rate against the background of lack of understanding of the essence of deferred taxes. Subsequently, the vector of research has changed towards determining the economic value of deferred taxes without reference to the theory of deferred taxation. The author proved that under the concept of fair value, deferred tax liabilities (DTL) do not need to be discounted because the assessment takes into account the minimum economic benefits generated by the asset as of the reporting date and under prevailing market conditions. It is shown that the balance sheet reflects the theoretical relationship between deferred tax liabilities and current income tax liabilities. The conclusion is made about the modifiability of deferred tax liabilities into current liabilities in terms of static accounting ideology while observing the going concern principle. The problems of applying valuation at fair value measurement that does not take into account the current tax position of the organization; as well as the place of deferred taxes in the capital accounting equation are raised. The results of the research have theoretical significance and can be used within the framework of improvement of the accounting legislation.

About the Author

A. A. Aksent'ev
Kuban State University
Russian Federation

Andrei A. Aksent’ev — Master’s student of Kuban State University, accountant, LLC “Perspektiva”

Krasnodar



References

1. Williams E.E., Findlay M.C. Discounting Deferred Tax Liabilities: Some Clarifying Comments. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1975;2(1):121–133.

2. Dotan A. On the Value of Deferred Taxes. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics. 2003;10(2):173–186.

3. Sansing R.C., Guenther D.A. The Valuation Relevance of Reversing Deferred Tax Liabilities. The Accounting Review. 2004;79(2):437–451.

4. Guenther D.A., Sansing R.C. Valuation of the Firm in the Presence of Temporary Book-Tax Differences: The Role of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities. The Accounting Review. 2000;75(1):1–12.

5. Sansing R.C. Valuing the Deferred Tax Liability. Journal of Accounting Research. 1998;36(2):357–363.

6. Breitkreuz R., Müßig A. On the fair value accounting of deferred taxes in international accounting. Journal of Business Administration. 2011;(81):1225–1256. (In German).

7. Aksent’ev A.A. The theory of deferred taxation: conceptual framework and evidence of applicability. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Economics. 2022;(60):141–169. (In Russ.).

8. Black H.A. Interperiod allocation of corporate income taxes; Accounting research study no. 09. URL:https://egrove.olemiss.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1154&context=aicpa_guides

9. Nurnberg H. Discounting Deferred Tax Liabilities. The Accounting Review. 1972;47(4):655–665.

10. Wolk H.I., Tearney M.G. Discounting deferred tax liabilities: review and analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1980;7(1):119–133.

11. Findlay M.C., Williams E.E. Discounting deferred tax liabilities: a reply. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1981;8(4):593–597.

12. Lemke K.W., Graul P.R. Deferred Taxes — an ‘Explicit Cost’ Solution to the Discounting Problem. Accounting and Business Research. 1981;11(44):309–315.

13. Wolk H.I., Saubert L.K., Tiernan F.M. A further note on discounting deferred taxes. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1984;11(2):253–255.

14. Findlay M.C., Williams E.E. Opportunity cost, discounting, and deferred tax liabilities: a final note. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1985;12(2):183–185.

15. Brown S., Lippitt J.Are deferred taxes discountable? Journal of Business Finace & Accounting. 1987;14(1):121–130.

16. Collins B., Rickard J., Selby M. Discounting of deferred tax liabilities. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1990;17(5):757–758.

17. Amir E., Kirschenheiter M., Willard K. The Aggregation and Valuation of Deferred Taxes. Review of Accounting Studies. 2001;(6):275–297.

18. Schultz S.M., Johnson R.T. Income tax allocation: The continuing controversy in historical perspective. Accounting Historians Journal. 1998;25(2):81–111.

19. Waugh J.B. The Interperiod Allocation of Corporate Income Taxes: A Proposal. The Accounting Review. 1968;43(3):535–539.

20. Graham W.J. Income Tax Allocation. The Accounting Review. 1959;34(1):14–27.

21. Sands J.E. Deferred Tax Credits are Liabilities. The Accounting Review. 1959;34(4):584–590.

22. Johnson A.W. “More” on “Income-Tax-Allocation” Accounting. The Accounting Review. 1961;36(1):75–83.

23. Hill T.M. Some Arguments against the Inter-Period Allocation of Income Taxes. The Accounting Review. 1957;32(3):357–361.

24. Jaedicke R. K., Nelson C. L. The Allocation of Income Taxes — A. Defense. The Accounting Review. 1960;35(2):278–281.

25. Graul P.R., Lemke K.W. On the Economic Substance of Deferred Taxes. Abacus. 1976;12(1):14–31.

26. Colley R., Rue J., Volkan A. Deferred Taxes Revisited. Journal of Business & Economics Research. 2004;2(8):13–24.

27. Boe S.R. The discounting controversy of deferred income taxes. Journal of Accounting Education. 1989;(7):309–315.

28. Brouwer A., Naarding E. Making deferred taxes relevant. Accounting in Europe. 2018;15(2):200–230.

29. Aksent’ev A.A. Essence and classification of deferred taxes. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ser. “Jekonomika” = Perm University Herald. ECONOMY. 2021;16(4):421–448. (In Russ.).

30. Chambers R.J. Tax Allocation and Financial Reporting. Abacus. 1968;4(2):99–123.

31. Barton A.D. Company Income Tax and Interperiod Allocation. Abacus. 1970;6(1):3–24.

32. Kreuze J.G., Main D. Case for Partial Tax Allocation: Will Enhance Comparability and Add Relevance. Woman C.P.A. 1986;48(1):14–19.

33. Raby Wm. L., Neubig R. D. Inter-Period Tax Allocation or Basis Adjustment? The Accounting Review. 1963;38(3):568–576.


Review

For citations:


Aksent'ev A.A. Discounting of Deferred Taxes: Theoretical Aspects. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2023;10(3):21-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2023-10-3-21-32

Views: 404


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2408-9303 (Print)
ISSN 2619-130X (Online)