Model of the Process of Production Requirements Management of a Coal Mining Enterprise under VUCA Conditions

The contemporary business environment presents companies with a multitude of uncontrollable risks. These include rapid technological development, changing customer behavior, new business models, shifting laws, and growing competition both domestically and internationally. The dynamic nature of these business environments, marked by high speed, complexity, multiple factors, and uncertainty, makes it difficult for companies to adapt and manage their operations. The relevance of finding new solutions for the company will only grow in the near future. The study aims to design a management model that accommodates the complex nature of analytical and control processes, ultimately boosting competitiveness. This paper explores the characteristics of a methodology for handling production demands in a coal mining firm within a VUCA environment, identifying major uncertainties and their solutions. The research used methods such as analysis, synthesis, systems approach and modeling. The paper proposes a model for managing coal mining enterprises using digital technologies. This model draws upon the best practices from both foreign and Russian industries and incorporates automation for planning, risk management, and feedback. The study demonstrates the significance of swift system feedback for optimizing coal mining operations under conditions of uncertainty. The outcome is a model that treats the coal mining enterprise’s production system as a unified whole. This model integrates management and operational subsystems into one large system, enabling effective management of financial, production, and human resources. This approach aims to optimize resource utilization. The author shows how to transform a business process “As is” into “To be”, as well as which fundamental weaknesses require special attention. Furthermore, the author suggests a multifactor feedback system to spot weaknesses and errors, allowing for their correction. The updated management model significantly cuts down on the time and workforce needed for the business process.

1. Nurul F. M.A., Siti S. O., Fazian H. VUCA: Theories, Concepts, and its Remedy. In book: Leading through the COVID-19 Crisis. Publisher: Penerbit UTHM; 2021:1–9. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363640334

2. Shakirova D. M., Repina E. Y., Hazishin A. A., Srurova A. T., Akbatyroov N. A. Risk management methods in the modern conditions of the VUCA world. Moskovskii ehkonomicheskii zhurnal = Moscow Economic Journal. 2022:(6):394–406. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.55186/2413046X_2022_7_6_350

3. Shipkova O. T., Akimova E. N., Shataeva O. V. Planning and decision-making tools in conditions of deep uncertainty as the basis for the proactive position of an economic entity. Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta prosveshcheniya = Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: Economics. 2022;(2):127–141. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18384/2310–6646–2022–2–127–141

4. Yusufova O. M., Shiboldenkov V. A., Ponomaryova E. I. Analysis of technologies for managing the production needs of a complex system under conditions of uncertainty. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Creative Economy. 2020;14(5):847–868. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/ce.14.5.100961

5. Tskhadadze N. V. Industry 4.0: The concept of impact on the economy. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovations and Investments. 2020;(7):45–45. (In Russ.). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/industriya-4–0-kontseptsiya-vozdeystviya-na-ekonomiku.

6. Alkhatib R., Lebdy R. Digital manufacturing and the Fifth industrial revolution. In book: Analyzing Future Applications of AI, Sensors, and Robotics in Society. 2021:69–86. DOI:10.4018/978–1–7998–3499–1.ch005

7. Lovkova E. S., Novikova O. A. Industry 4.0 — positive and negative aspects of development. Zhurnal prikladnykh issledovanii = Journal of Applied Research. 2021;(4–1):68–72. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47576/2712–7516_2021_4_1_68

8. Martynova Yu. A. Innovation strategies and change management in industrial complex: Adaptation to dynamic market conditions and technological trends Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovations and Investments. 2023;(6):9–12. (In Russ.).

9. Halimon E. A., Geokchakyan A. G. Economic management from the perspective of scientific and digital labor organizations. Vestnik universiteta = Bulletin of the University. 2021;(2):130–135. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26425/1816–4277–2021–2–130–135

10. Batievskaya V. B., Sokolovskij M. V. Labor productivity of Miners at open-pits and mines of the Kemerovo region. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic sciences. 2022;(2):237–242. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21603/2500–3372–2022–7–2–237–242

11. Mishin S. P. Optimal incentive of managers with uncertain types in multi-tier firm. Upravlenie bol’shimi sistemami = Large Systems Management. 2008;(22):168–206. (In Russ.).

12. Slagmulder R., Devoldere B. Transforming under deep uncertainty: A strategic perspective on risk management. Business Horizons. 2018;61(5):733–743. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.05.001

13. Zotova A. I. System approach to planning of activity of the enterprise. Biznes v zakone. Ehkonomikoyuridicheskii zhurnal = Business in law. Economic and Legal Journal. 2014;2:28–32. (In Russ.). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sistemnyy-podhod-k-planirovaniyu-deyatelnosti-predpriyatiya/viewer

14. Walker W. E., Marchau V. A.W.J., Swanson D. Addressing deep uncertainty using adaptive policies: Introduction to section 2. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2010;77(6):917–923. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.004

15. Haasnoot M., Kwakkel J., Walker W., van Maat J. Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Global Environmental Change. 2013;23(2):485–498. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006

16. Neufville R., Smet K. Engineering Options Analysis (EOA). In book: Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty. Springer; 2019:117–132. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332236466_Engineering_Options_Analysis_EOA

17. Lempert R. J., Popper S. W., Bankes S. C. Shaping the next one hundred years: New methods for quantitative, long-term strategy analysis (MR-1626-RPC). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation; 2003. 208 p. DOI: 10.7249/MR1626

18. Hastings D., Mcmanus H. A Framework for Understanding Uncertainty and its Mitigation and Exploitation in Complex Systems. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2006;34(3):81–81. DOI: 10.1109/EMR.2006.261384