F.V. Yezerskiy Personality’s Influence on the Development of his Scientific Views

The paper explores accounting theories focusing on the influence of Fyodor Ezerskiy’s, one of the most famous Russian accountants, his identity and surroundings. The history of his triple Russian accounting is the subject of research both in our country and abroad. The study uses the prosopographical and archival research methods. The authors aim to analyze the works of F.V. Ezerskiy in comparison with similar works of his time. Russian triple-entry bookkeeping, as research shows, is a double-entry system variation where equity equals assets minus liabilities, mirroring English practices. And they are in no way related to the ideas of Ijiri’s triple-entry bookkeeping. Ezerskiy’s system originated from two sources: his War Office budgetary accounting experience and Johnson’s English accounting system. In order to spread it, he created conditions under which everyone knew it. Ezerskiy spurred debate among academic accountants on his system by critiquing double-entry bookkeeping and promoting his own in his journals. Ezerskiy’s courses trained over 15,000 accountants in Russia’s triple-entry bookkeeping system over 40 years. Also, he attracted like-minded supporters and sympathizers by establishing an accountant’s society, offering professional development and family-friendly activities. The system developed by Ezerskiy became not only his life’s work but also a way to earn money. Although the pioneering bookkeeper, who shunned traditional Italian double-entry methods, was famous, Ezerskiy was not unique. The authors’ analysis in this paper established that Ezerskiy’s system closely resembles the ideas of E. Dégrange (Sr.) — the creator of the so called an American accounting form. They simplified accounting by employing auxiliary registers and decreasing the number of general ledger accounts. The phrase “triple-entry bookkeeping” pre-dates Ezerskiy; Rodolphe Roupp’s book describes a system much like Dégrange’s. Like Ezerskiy, Roupp also noted that his triple-entry bookkeeping was necessary to avoid errors in the records. This doesn’t diminish Ezerskiy’s contributions; his era’s accounting systems were distinguished by the number of registers, not the number of accounts used. This is also characteristic of Ezerskiy’s system.

1. Motyka W. The Impact of Western Europe on Accounting Development in Tsarist Russia Prior to 1800. Abacus. 1990;(26):36–62.

2. Bailey D. The attempt to establish the Russian accounting profession 1875–1931. Accounting, Business and Financial History. 1992;2(1):1–24.

3. Mattessich R. Accounting research and researchers of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century: An international survey of authors, ideas and publications. Accounting, Business and Financial History. 2003;13(2):125–170.

4. Mukhanova İ. The role of professional accounting societies in the development of accounting in Russia from a historical perspective. Muhasebe ve Finans Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2018;(15):189–210.

5. Karelskaia S.N., Zuga E.I. Russian triple-entry bookkeeping: a new procedure or content? Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International accounting. 2015;27(369):48–60. (In Russ.).

6. Karelskaia S. N., Zuga E. I. Triple-entry bookkeeping theory of Yu. Idziri. Auditorskiye vedomosti = Audit journal. 2015;(8):62–74. (In Russ.).

7. Sokolov V. Ya. Prosopographic analysis of the personality F.V. Ezersky. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2020;5(125):219–227. (In Russ.).

8. Cai C. W. Triple-entry accounting with blockchain: How far have we come? Accounting and Finance. 2021;61(1):71–93.

9. Sokolov Ya.V. Accounting: from its origins to the present day. Moscow: Audit; 1996. 640 p. (In Russ.).

10. Sokolov Ya.V., Bychkova S.M. Russian accounting in the XX-th century. Report on the International conference “General accounting theory. Towards balancing the society”, Poland; 2004:1–66.

11. Sokolov V.A History of professional accounting societies in St. Petersburg. Accounting History. 2015;20(3):375–395.

12. Platonova N.V. F.V. Ezersky and the development of accounting thought and practices in Russia. Vestnik NSUEM = Vestnik NGUEU. 2015;(4):160–170. (In Russ.).

13. Edwards J. R. Subjects, sources and dissemination. In: The Routledge Сompanion to Accounting History. London: Routledge; 2009:50–69.

14. Carnegie G.D., Napier C.J. Accounting’s past, present and future: the unifying power of history. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 2012;25(2):328–369.

15. Fowler C.J., Keeper T. Twenty years of Accounting History, 1996–2015: Evidence of the changing faces of accounting history research. Accounting History. 2016;21(4):389–418.

16. Degos J.-G., Mattessich R. German and French writers: some relevant alternatives to IAS–IFRS conceptual framework. International Journal of Critical Accounting. 2012;4(4):380–400.

17. Carnegie G.D., Napier C.J. Critical and interpretive histories: Insights into accounting’s present and future through its past. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 1996;9(3):7–39.

18. Flowers W.B. Biography and accounting history. Accounting Historians Journal. 1974;1(1–4):21–22.

19. Parker R.H. Research needs in accounting history. Accounting Historians Journal. 1977;4(2):1–28.

20. Previts G.J., Parker L.D., Coffman E.N. An accounting historiography: Subject matter and methodology. Abacus. 1990;26(2):136–158.

21. Degos J.-G. Un comptable moderne sous la revolution: le bordelais Pierre Boucher. Revue francaise de comptabilite. 1989;202:170–191.

22. Shelton W., Jacobs K. Allan Douglas Barton: A scholar who spanned theory and practice. Accounting History. 2015;20(1):20–42.

23. Carnegie G. D. Robert William Gibson, an all-round accounting contribution. Accounting History. 2016;21(4):419–444.

24. Platonova N.V. F.V. Ezersky and the development of the theory and practice of accounting in Russia. Vestnik NGUEU = Vestnik NSUEM. 2015;(4):160–170. (In Russ.).

25. Dmitriev A.L. Triple-entry Russian accounting system’ and its inventor Fyodor Venediktovich Ezersky. Accounting in St. Petersburg. 1703–2003. Ya.V. Sokolov, ed. St. Petersburg: Yuridicheskii Tsentr Press; 2003:136–160. (In Russ.).

26. Ezersky F.V. The theory of commercial accounting according to the new system, Dresden; St. Petersburg; 1873. 115 p. (In Russ.).

27. Ezersky F.V. Russian simplified triple system as the latest word in science. Edition XXV. Petrograd; Moscow: Printing house of the “Godfather Calendar”; 1915: VIII, 111 p. (In Russ.).

28. Jubilee edition of XL (1859–1899) of literary works, XXX (1869/1870–1899/1900) of the Russian triple accounting system and XXV (1874–1899) of F.V. Ezersky’s accounting courses (1899), St. Petersburg; Moscow: Tipografiya A.V. Vasilyeva, 1899. ХХ, 164, 127 с. (In Russ.).

29. Ezersky F.V. Single-entry, double-entry, English and other systems in the order of their historical development; analysis of accounting systems and textbooks. Complete visual accounting practice using the following systems. St. Petersburg; Moscow: Tipografiya Ministerstva putei soobshcheniya; 1903. 92 p. (In Russ.).

30. Ezersky F.V. The founders of the Institute of Accountants. Prakticheskaya zhizn’. 1913:15–19. (In Russ.).

31. Ezersky F.V. Simplified triple-entry system. 18th ed. St. Petersburg; Moscow: Tipografiya Gattsuk; 1908. 111 p. (In Russ.).

32. Sokolov Ya.V. Fundamentals of accounting theory. Moscow: Finance and statistics; 2003. 496 p. (In Russ.).

33. Pomazkov N.S. Accounting theories. Leningrad; 1929. 268 p. (In Russ.).

34. Karelskaia S.N., Zuga E.I. Balance sheet equations and equations in the history of Russian accounting. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International accounting. 2012;(43):55–63. (In Russ.).

35. Dégrange E. Supplément à la Tenue des livres rendue facile: ou Nouvelle méthode d’enseignement de la tenue des livres en double partie. Paris, 1804. (In France).

36. Dégrange E. La tenue des livres; ou, Nouveau cours de comptabilité générale. 32 ed. Paris: Librairie Hachette; 1896. (In France).

37. Schiebe A. Die Lehre von der Buchhaltung, theoretisch und praktisch dargestellt. 3rd ed. Grimma: J.M. Gebhardt; 1847. (In German).

38. Kheil, C. P. Über “Amerikanische” Buchführung. Wien: Manzsche k. u. k. Hof-Verlags und UniversitätsBuchhandlung; 1908. (In German).

39. Roupp R. Nouveau traité de tenue des livres, avec balance perpétuelle et repertoire-grand livre par Rodolphe Roupp [Partie 2]. Paris: Bonvallet; 1829. (In France).

40. Waldenberg E.G. The triple-entry bookkeeping system (F.V. Ezersky) before the court of specialists in theory and practice. Detailed report on the meetings of the special commission with comments by the editors of the journal “Accounting” and their additions. Moscow: Izdanie S.P. Sholokhova; 1897. (In Russ.).

41. Kiryushin E. In memory of F.V. Ezersky. Schetovodstvo. 1925;5(535):533–535. (In Russ.).