Повышает ли стоимость компании публикация нефинансовых отчетов по стандартам GRI? (на примере стран БРИКС)
https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2017--2-28-36
Аннотация
В статье приводится обзор литературы о влиянии публикации нефинансовых отчетов (НФО) на отношение рыночной стоимости капитала к балансовой и эмпирическое исследование на основе сравнения компаний, выпускавших отчеты в соответствии со стандартами Глобальной инициативы по отчетности (Global Reporting Initiative, GRI) в 2004-2014 гг., с компаниями, опубликовавшими только финансовую отчетность. Анализ проводился на основе выборки из компаний в Бразилии, России, Индии, Китае и Южно-Африканской Республике (БРИКС). Финансовые данные были получены из базы данных Compustat, список компаний, выпускающих нефинансовые отчеты, был получен на веб-сайте GRI. Используя последнюю версию модели Олсона, было выявлено, что выпуск отчета в соответствии с принципами GRI оказывает положительное влияние на отношение рыночной стоимости капитала к балансовой в течение года и через год после выпуска отчета. Кроме того, были определены сектора, для которых публикация НФО является значимой.
Список литературы
1. Gilbert D. U., Rasche A. (2007). Discourse ethics and social accountability: The ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, no. 17 (02), pp. 187-216.
2. Doni F., Gasperini A. (2014). The internal integrated reporting and the value creation: a case study approach. Knowledge and Management Models for Sustainable Growth, e-book, of Proceedings of IFKAD, (International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics), pp. 2666-2704.
3. Rasche A. (2009). Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards - The case of the UN Global Compact. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, no. 16 (4), pp. 192-205.
4. Levy D. L., Brown H. S., De Jong M. (2010). The Contested politics of corporate governance the case of the global reporting initiative. Business & Society, no. 49 (1), pp. 88-115.
5. Roca L. C., Searcy C. (2012). An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, no. 20 (1), pp. 103-118.
6. Schadewitz H., Niskala M. (2010). Communication via responsibility reporting and its effect on firm value in Finland. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, no. 17 (2), pp. 96-106.
7. Abeysekera I. (2013). A template for integrated reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, no. 14 (2), pp. 227-245.
8. Cheng M., Green W., Conradie P., Konishi N., Romi A. (2014). The international integrated reporting framework: key issues and future research opportunities. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, no. 25 (1), pp. 90-119.
9. Hassel L., Nilsson H., Nyquist S. (2005). The value relevance of environmental performance. European Accounting Review, no. 14 (1), pp. 41-61.
10. de Klerk M., de Villiers C. (2012). The value relevance of corporate responsibility reporting: South African evidence. Meditari Accountancy Research, no. 20 (1), pp. 21-38.
11. Iatridis G. E. (2013). Environmental disclosure quality: Evidence on environmental performance, corporate governance and value relevance. Emerging Markets Review, no. 14, pp. 55-75.
12. Liu H., Salama A., Dixon R. (2014). The Value Relevance of Environmental Disclosure in China, paper presented at 37th Annual Congress, European Accounting Association, Tallinn, Estonia, 21-23 May, 2014.
13. Ohlson J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary accounting research, no. 11 (2), pp. 661-687.
14. Murray A., Sinclair D., Power D., Gray R. (2006). Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Further evidence and exploration from the UK. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, no. 19 (2), pp. 228-255.
15. Cormier D., Magnan M. (2007). The revisited contribution of environmental reporting to investors’ valuation of a firm’s earnings: An international perspective. Ecological economics, no. 62 (3), pp. 613-626.
16. Semenova N., Hassel L. G., Nilsson H. (2010). The Value Relevance of Environmental and Social Performance: Evidence from Swedish SIX 300 Companies. Liiketaloudellinen Aikakauskirja, (3).
17. Moneva J. M., Cuellar B. (2009). The value relevance of financial and non-financial environmental reporting. Environmental and Resource Economics, no. 44 (3), pp. 441-456.
18. Moroney R., Windsor C., Aw Y. T. (2012). Evidence of assurance enhancing the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures: an empirical analysis. Accounting & Finance, no. 52 (3), pp. 903-939.
19. Wu H., Shen X. (2010). Environmental disclosure, environmental performance and firm value. In 2010 International Conference on E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment (ICEEE2010) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
20. Vafaei A., Taylor D., Ahmed K. (2011). The value relevance of intellectual capital disclosures. Journal of Intellectual Capital, no. 12 (3), pp. 407-429.
21. Carnevale C., Mazzuca M., Venturini S. (2012). Corporate social reporting in European banks: The effects on a firm’s market value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, no. 19 (3), pp. 159-177.
22. Sierra-García L., Zorio-Grima A., García-Benau M.A. (2015). Stakeholder engagement, corporate social responsibility and integrated reporting: An exploratory study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, no. 22 (5), pp. 286-304.
23. Oshika T., & Saka, C. (2015). Created Value as Sustainability KPIs for Integrated Reporting. Available at: SSRN 2547339.
24. Barth M. E., Cahan S. F., Chen L., Venter E. R. (2015). The Economic Consequences Associated with Integrated Report Quality: Early Evidence from a Mandatory Setting. Available at: SSRN 2699409.
25. Alonso-Almeida M., Llach J., Marimon F. (2014). A closer look at the «Global Reporting Initiative» sustainability reporting as a tool to implement environmental and social policies: A worldwide sector analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, no. 21 (6), pp. 318-335.
26. Chkili W., Nguyen D. K. (2014). Exchange rate movements and stock market returns in a regime-switching environment: Evidence for BRICS countries. Research in International Business and Finance, no. 31, pp. 46-56.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Кузубов С.А., Евдокимова М.С. Повышает ли стоимость компании публикация нефинансовых отчетов по стандартам GRI? (на примере стран БРИКС). Учет. Анализ. Аудит. 2017;(2):28-36. https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2017--2-28-36
For citation:
Kuzubov S.А., Evdokimova M.S. Does the Company Value Increase through the Publication of Non-Financial Reports under GRI Guidelines? (On the Example of BRICS Countries). Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2017;(2):28-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2017--2-28-36
Просмотров:
620
.png)
.png)
Послать статью по эл. почте 
