Pros and Cons of Public Borrowing and Public Debt for the Russian Budget System
https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2019-6-4-61-69
Abstract
The article is devoted to the advantages and disadvantages of debt instruments to finance government needs. This topic is relevant because the current economic situation in conjunction with the tasks of breakthrough development requires a sufficient level of sustainability of public finance. To substantiate in detail the possibility of using public debt the article describes the basic peculiarities of budgeting mechanism: what a budget is, its revenue and expenditure, effective budget balancing in case of budget deficit. Within the given framework, the author focuses on the essence of public debt and borrowing, determines their place in the budgeting mechanism, reviews foreign experience and identifies advantages and disadvantages of this tool which makes it possible to assess the necessity of applying this mechanism. The conclusion is made that using public borrowing is appropriate because it provides an opportunity for budget maneuvering and helps to mitigate negative consequences of economic shocks but it is necessary to take into account the current economic situation along with the risks of financial stability, thus to conduct a balanced debt policy.
About the Authors
N. N. Parasotskaya
LLC “MMTI”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natal’ya N. Parasotskaya — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Financial Director.
Moscow.
N. D. Yakovlev
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikita D. Yakovlev — 2 year graduate student.
Moscow.
References
1. Yakupova A. V. The Essence and functions of public loans. NovaInfo. 2016;(45):216–219. (In Russ.).
2. Lozhechko A. S. State credits of the Russian Federation: problems of theory and practice. Financu i kredit = Finance and credit. 2018;771(3):522–536. (In Russ.).
3. Pakova O. N., Lykova T. K. State credit and public debt of Russia. Innovatsionnaya nauka = Innovative science. 2017;1(1):87–89. (In Russ.).
4. Tedeeva R. A., Kovalev A. N., Luksha I. M. The problems and prospects of development of recipient regions. Vestnik Belgorodskogo universiteta kooperatsii. = Bulletin of Belgorod University of cooperation. 2018;4:(71):30–39. (In Russ.).
5. Nemenova D. L. Institutional model of public debt of Russia. Voprosy rossiiskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava = Questions of Russian and international law. 2017;(5A):248–258. (In Russ.).
6. Antonio A., Joao T. J. Growth and productivity: The role of government debt. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2013;(6):384–407.
7. Aura D., Vytautas S. Selection of government debt evaluation methods based on the concept of sustainability of the debt. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;(8):474–480.
8. Croce M. M., Thien T. N. Government debt and the returns to innovation. Journal of Financial Economics. 2019;(2):205–225.
9. David A., Fernando M. M. Monetary policy and liquid government debt. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2018;2(12):83–199.
10. Mathieu G. Government debt and growth: The role of liquidity. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2018;(3):1–22.
11. Yuting B., Campbell L. Nominal targeting in an economy with government debt. European Economic Review. 2017;(2):103–125.
12. Nicolas J., Leandro G. M. Determinants of sub-central European government debt. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics. 2017;(3):52–62.
13. Kurdova M. A., Shishkina A. R. The Current state of the public debt of the Russian Federation and the direction of its regulation. Alleya nauki = Alley of science. 2018;3(19):87–91. (In Russ.).
14. Edovina T. Never. Kommersant. Business guide = Kommersant business guide. 2017;(41):8–9. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Parasotskaya N.N., Yakovlev N.D. Pros and Cons of Public Borrowing and Public Debt for the Russian Budget System. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2019;6(4):61-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2019-6-4-61-69
Views:
7450
.png)
.png)
Email this article 
