Systematisation of Scientific approaches to the definition of capital as an Economic and accounting category

Capital is a complex definition and differences in its interpretations lead to ambiguous perception of information by specialists from different scientific fields, incl. accounting. In the course of the work, it was revealed that the views of representatives of economic schools on the concept of “capital” became more complicated due to both positive perception and criticism of previous scientific works, depending on the current economic conditions. This allowed the author to present his own opinion on the impact of different approaches to the interpretation of this term on the development of accounting methods, its evolution in accounting and balance sheet theories, which was the purpose of this study. The definition of “capital” in accounting has come a long way of development, starting from the digraphic stage, characterized by the appearance of a double entry. Since this work on the study of the development of the concept of Capital was carried out in the context of the classification of accounts, taking into consideration the economic and legal interpretation of business transactions; its result was the author’s vision of the evolution of accounts and the place of Capital in this system. The scientific novelty of this work lies in the fact that, based on the historical-logical approach and the method of system-chronological analysis, the development of the definition of Capital in accounting and balance theories has been studied with the justification of its special function — an indicator of the increase or depletion of resources that generate economic benefits and profits remaining at the disposal of the owners of the organization. The theoretical significance of the work lies in the generalization of existing knowledge and the improvement of the conceptual apparatus of the definition of Capital. The results of this work can be used to improve individual financial reporting taxonomies. In the process of research, such methods as grouping, system-chronological analysis, comparison, generalization were used.

1. Diewert W.E. The Measurement of Productivity. Bulletin of Economic Research. 1992;(44):165–198.

2. Alexander S. S., Bronfenbrenne M., Fabricant S., Warburton C. Five monographs on business income. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants; 1950. 271 р.

3. Zaletnyj A.A. Financial capital: an inside view. Moscow: TEIS; 2014. 232 р. (In Russ.).

4. Schmidt F. The Importance of Replacement Value. The Accounting Review. 1930;5(3):235–242.

5. Kovalev V.V., Kovalev Vit.V. Balance sheet analysis. Moscow: Prospekt; 2017. 912 р. (In Russ.).

6. Chatfield M., Vangermeersch R. G.J. The History of Accounting: an International Encyclopedia. New York: Garland; 1996. 649 p.

7. Smith А. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations Transl. from Eng. Klyukin P.N.). Moscow: Eksmo; 2016. 1056 p. (In Russ.).

8. Frydman R. Capitalism With a Comrade’s Face: Studies in the Postcommunist Transition. Budapest: Central European University Press; 1989. 389 р.

9. Blaug М., Мun Т. Great Economists before Keynes: An introduction to the lives & works of one hundred great economists of the past. St. Petersburg: Ekonomikus; 2008. 352 p. (In Russ.).

10. Pacioli L. A Treatise on Accounts and Records. Transl. and ed. by M.I. Kutter. Majkop: JelIT; 2015. 306 p. (In Russ.).

11. Marx К. Capital. Criticism of classical political economy. Vol. 1. Мoscow: Gospolitizdat; 1955. 900 p. (In Russ.).

12. Trahtenberg I.A. François Quesnay and his Economic Table. Capitalist reproduction and economic crises. 2nd edition. Мoscow: Gospolitizdat; 1954. 199 p. (In Russ.).

13. Marx К., Engels F. Сollected works. Vol. 26, part 1. Мoscow: Gospolitizdat; 1962. 467 p. (In Russ.).

14. Anikin A.V. World History of Economic Thought. Мoscow: Mysl; 1988. 574 p. (In Russ.).

15. Marx К., Engels F. Сollected works. Vol. 22, part 2. Мoscow: Gospolitizdat; 1962. 698 p. (In Russ.).

16. Marx К., Engels F. Сollected works. Vol. 27. Мoscow: Gospolitizdat; 1962. 683 p. (In Russ.).

17. Sokolov Ja.V., Terent’eva T.O. Professional judgment of an accountant: results of the past century. Buhgalterskij uchet = Accounting. 2001;(12):53–57. (In Russ.).

18. Stone D. Luca Pacioli, algebra, and double entry. Revista Española de Historia de la Contabilidad. 2021;18(1):31–54. (In Spain).

19. Previts G. J., Walton Р., Wolnizer Р. Global History of Accounting, Financial Reporting and Public Policy: Eurasia, Middle East and Africa. Sydney: Emerald; 2012. 200 р.

20. Peragallo E. Origin and Evolution of Double Entry Bookkeeping. A study of Italian practice from the fourteenth century. New York: American Institute Publishing Company; 1938. 156 р.

21. Galagan A. M. The newest Italian forms of double-entry bookkeeping: Logismography and statmography. Мoscow: Printing House by D. CHernyshev i N. Kobel’kov; 1912. 156 с. (In Russ.).

22. Akat’eva M.D. Historical prerequisites for the emergence of legal perception of the facts of economic activity. Mezhdunarodnyj buhgalterskij uchet = International Accounting. 2014;45(339):57–63. (In Russ.).

23. Krioni A. E. The Genesis of the Private Financial Control in Ancient Russia. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Audit. 2019;6(3):76–83. (In Russ.).

24. Guo D. The Historical Contributions of Chinese Accounting. The Accounting Historians Notebook. 1989;2(12):1–5.

25. Arkhipoff O. Formalisme comptable: de la comptabilité d’entreprise à la comptabilité nationale. Journal de la société statistique de Paris. 1984;3(125):164–185. (In French).

26. Mudrov Je.A. Accounting for all kinds of trade. St. Petersburg: The Printing Office of the Department of Foreign Trade; 1846. 373 p. (In Russ.).

27. Cygankov K. Ju. The concept of capital in accounting, political economy and economic theory. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian Financial School. 2007;(4):11–20. (In Russ.).

28. Scher J. F. Accounting and balance (transl. from German by Zederbaum S. I., ed. by Lunsky N. S.). Мoscow: Ekonomicheskaja zhizn; 1925. 575 p. (In Russ.).

29. Pjatov M. L. Evolution of accounting methodology within the framework of the company’s balance sheet model. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika = St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies. 2014;(4):56–75. (In Russ.).

30. Sprague C. E. The philosophy of accounts. New York: Ronald Press; 1922. 57 р.

31. Krivda S.V. The emergence and development of the account “Capital” as an accounting category. Finansovyj vestnik = Financial Bulletin. 2014;(12):29–38. (In Russ.)

32. Pjatov M.L., Karel’skaja S.N. Balance theories as a key to understanding the limits of the possibilities of modern accounting and the mechanism of its perception. Vestnik Polockogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta = Bulletin of Polotsk State University. 2011;(5):70–76. (In Russ.).