FinTech and DeFi: Directions for Digital Adaptation of Banks

The article is devoted to the study of decentralised finance (DeFi) as a new stage of digitalisation of the financial sector, characterized by the rejection of centralised intermediation in favor of protocol-controlled mechanisms. Unlike previous FinTech trends, such as P2P lending, crowdfunding and neobanks, DeFi involves the elimination of organisational structures as bearers of trust and their replacement with self-executing smart contracts. The purpose of the study is to consider DeFi not as another technological solution, but as an institutional form that changes ideas about the structure of financial intermediation, principles of trust and the possibilities of compatibility with the banking system. The methodological base of the article is based on institutional analysis based on the study of the characteristics of subjectivity, distribution of responsibility, sources of sustainability and regulatory mechanisms in FinTech models and DeFi protocols. Based on a comparative analysis of the stages of digital transformation, the differences between DeFi protocols are revealed in the parameters of the center of responsibility, system compatibility, identification principles, risk resistance and potential consistency with supervisory mechanisms. The article shows that DeFi cannot be viewed as a linear continuation of FinTech. The exclusion of traditional participants from the financial service chain poses the task of rethinking the legal, organisational and economic categories on which the functioning of the modern banking system is based. The scientific novelty of the study lies in identifying institutional differences between FinTech and DeFi not only in terms of technological features, but also in the structure of subjectivity, risk distribution, formalisability of obligations and the possibility of interaction with banks. It is concluded that the spread of DeFi does not require the adaptation of existing supervisory instruments, but the development of new institutional regulatory strategies and forms of interaction with centralised financial institutions.

1. Freedman S., Jin G.Z. Do Social Networks Solve Information Problems for Peer-to-Peer Lending? Evidence from Prosper.Com (November 14, 2008). NET Institute Working Paper No. 08–43. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1304138 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1304138

2. Claessens S., Frost J., Turner G., Zhu F. Fintech Credit Markets Around the World: Size, Drivers and Policy Issues (September 1, 2018). BIS Quarterly Review September 2018. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3288096

3. Ziegler T., Shneor R., Zhang, B.Z. The Global Status of the Crowdfunding Industry. Advances in Crowdfunding. Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. Cham. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46309-0_3

4. Mollick E. R. The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Venturing. 2014;29(1):1–16. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2088298

5. Havrylchyk O., Mariotto C., Rahim Talal-Ur-, Verdier M. The Expansion of the Peer-to-Peer Lending. August 23; 2019. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2841316

6. Bruton G., Khavul, S., Siegel D., Wright M. New Financial Alternatives in Seeding Entrepreneurship: Microfinance, Crowdfunding, and Peer–to–Peer Innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2015;39(1):9–26. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12143

7. Belleflamme P., Lambert, Thomas and Schwienbacher, Armin, Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd. Journal of Business Venturing. 2014;29(5):585–609. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1578175

8. Cumming D., Hornuf L., Karami M., Schweizer D. Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding. Journal of Business Ethics. 2023;182(4):1103–1128. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551–021–04942-w

9. Agrawal A., Gans J. S., Goldfarb A. Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2019;33(2):31–50. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26621238

10. Buchak G., Gregor M., Piskorski T., Seru A. Fintech, Regulatory Arbitrage, and the Rise of Shadow Banks (Маrch 2017). NBER Working Paper No. w23288. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2941266

11. Boot A. W.A., Hoffmann P., Laeven L. A., Ratnovski L., Ratnovski L. Fintech: What’s Old, What’s New? (December 29, 2020). Journal of Financial Stability. 2021. ADB-IGF Special Working Paper Series “Fintech to Enable Development, Investment, Financial Inclusion, and Sustainability”. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3756798

12. Harvey C.R., Ramachandran A., Santoro J. DeFi and the Future of Finance (April 5, 2021). URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3711777

13. Werner S.M., Perez D., Gudgeon L., Klages-Mundt A., Harz D., Knottenbelt W.J. SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi). Papers 2101.08778. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08778

14. Mahmood S., Chadhar M., Firmin S. Cybersecurity Challenges in Blockchain Technology: A Scoping Review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. 2022;(1).11. URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7384000

15. Zetzsche D.A., Arner D. W., Buckley R. P. Decentralized Finance (DeFi). Journal of Financial Regulation. 2020;(6):172–203. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3539194

16. Auer R., Cornelli G., Frost J. Rise of the central bank digital currencies: drivers, approaches and technologies. BIS Working Papers 880, Bank for International Settlements. URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/work880.pdf

17. Tobias A., Mancini-Griffoli T. The Rise of Digital Money. Annual Review of Financial Economics. 2021;(13): 57–77. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3957027

18. Schär F. Decentralized Finance: On Blockchain- and Smart Contract-based Financial Markets. FRB of St. Louis Review. 2021;103(2):153–174. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3571335

19. Arner D.W., Buckley R.P., Zetzsche D.A., Veidt R. Sustainability, FinTech and Financial Inclusion (November 1, 2019). European Banking Institute Working Paper Series 2019/41, University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper No. 006–2019, UNSW Law Research Paper No. 19–63, University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2019/038, European Business and Organization Law Review (Forthcoming). URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3387359

20. Qin Z., Shanyun X. Regulatory experimentation in China’s Peer-To-Peer lending market. Tsinghua China Law Review. 2022;15(1):59–93. URL: http://www.tsinghuachinalawreview.law.tsinghua.edu.cn/UploadFiles/2023–04–03/vrxvtgpzgldkvgge.pdf?My4gUDJQLnBkZg

21. Joseph Sinkey Jr. Financial management in commercial banking and in the financial services industry. Moscow: Alpina Business Books; 2007. 1018 p. (In Russ.).