Development of the Methodology of Recognition and Assessment of Social Obligations in the Financial Statements of Companies
https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2025-12-3-62-75
Abstract
The relevance of this research work of accounting methodology is determined in the context of increased requirements on behalf of stakeholders for information reporting on financial statements. Due to intensive development of social policy, companies actively implement corporate pension programmes, which require proper assessing and timely recognition of pension liabilities in accounting. The purpose of this research work is to identify and analyse problematic aspects of accounting for social commitments to employees, particularly, corporate pension programmes, as well as to develop a methodology for generating accounting information about this group of corporate commitments. The methodological basis for the given research work includes systematic and dialectical approaches, along with such a set of general scientific methods of cognition, as observation, systematization, comparison and generalisation. The given article considers domestic and foreign norms of accounting regulations related to employee remuneration, including payment after the termination of labour activity. In order to analyse practical aspects of this topic, the author used the actual reporting data of several largest Russian enterprises in the mining and metallurgical sectors. The findings of the study reveal the insufficiency of regulations on accounting for pension liabilities in the Russian accounting system. The article substantiates the need to refine on the rules for recongnising and assessing pension liabilities, and it suggests the ways to improve the quality and reliability of accounting information used for reporting purposes in accordance with Russian accounting standards.
About the Author
A. A. TrushinaRussian Federation
Anastasiya A. Trushina — Postgraduate Student of the Department of Audit and Corporate Reporting of the Faculty of Taxes, Audit and Business Analysis
Moscow
References
1. Grishkina S.N., Trushina A.A. Recognition and measurement of obligations to withdraw assets in accordance with IFRS and GAAP. Economic Sciences.2022;209:278–284. (In Russ.).
2. Grishkina S. N., Trushina A. A. Features of recognition and evaluation of environmental remedetion obligations in accordance with IFRS and US GAAP. Bukhuchet v sel’skom khozyaistve = Accounting in Agriculture. 2022;5:381–391. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33920/sel‑11–2205–05
3. Grishkina S.N., Trushina A.A. Environmental obligations: new requirements for the presentation of information in corporate reporting. Auditor. 2024;10(7):32–39. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/1998–0701–2024–10–7–32–39
4. Grishkina S. N., Trushina A. A. Environmental liabilities as an object of accounting: The concept and main classification criteria. Ehkonomicheskie nauki = Economic Sciences. 2024;230:73–84. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14451/1.230.73
5. Vakhrushina M.A. Disclosure of information on employee benefits and social provision in the financial statements of public companies. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International accounting. 2011;20(170):2–14. (In Russ.).
6. Neelova N.V. Generating data for disclosure of liabilities under defined benefit pension plans in IFRS-based consolidated financial statements. International accounting. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International accounting. 2015;18(13):30–45.
7. Cheglakova S.G., Vilkova G.S. Disclosure of information in financial statements on employee benefits in accordance with the requirements of IFRS. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International accounting. 2014;17(23):2–8.
8. Sholomitsky A.G. Actuarial valuation of pension plans for the purposes of IFRS. Corporate financial statements. International standards. 2010;4(42):19–23. (In Russ.).
9. Sholomitsky A. G. IAS accounting for benefit plans: principles and actuarial methods: Working paper WP16/2007/01. Moscow: State University — Higher School of Economics; 2007. 40 p. (In Russ.).
10. Klinov N.N. Accounting and reporting on pension plans. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit Journal. 2014;1:57–69. (In Russ.).
11. Granitsa Yu.V. Prospects for the recognition of long-term pension and option obligations to employees in the system of accounting indicators of an economic entity. Development of science and education. Collective monograph. Issue 1. Cheboksary: Sreda; 2019:86–99. (In Russ.).
12. Harjoto M.A., Laksmana I. Defined benefit pension policies and social responsibility performance: Do socially responsible firms walk the talk? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2020;12(2):297–329. DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ‑01–2020–0019
13. Serebryakova T. Yu. Problematic issues of estimated liabilities in payroll accounting. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2017;3:45–54. (In Russ.).
14. Phan H.V., Hedge S.P. Pension contributions and firm performance: Evidence from frozen defined benefit plans. Financial Management. 2013;42(2):373–411.
15. Comprix J., Muller K.A. Pension plan accounting estimates and the freezing of defined benefit pension plans. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2011;51:115–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.06.003
Review
For citations:
Trushina A.A. Development of the Methodology of Recognition and Assessment of Social Obligations in the Financial Statements of Companies. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2025;12(3):62-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2025-12-3-62-75