Falsifcation of Financial Statements: Concept and Tools of Identifcation
https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2018-5-6-37-49
Abstract
To succeed in a market economy an economic entity should attract investments. The quality of accounting and analytical information about a company’s activities is an important factor in the decisions potential investors make. Accounting (fnancial) reporting is a signifcant part of the informational support of the company’s activity. The problem of reliability of the accounting (fnancial) statements has always been relevant. According to the modern concept of business audit, audit is primarily understood as an activity aimed at reducing business risks. Nowadays the main task of an auditor is to provide assurance that the accounting (fnancial) reporting does not contain signifcant misstatements because of its falsifcation, or mistakes made by employees of the auditee. Assessing the risk of fnancial statements falsifcation is an urgent and diffcult task. Though the term “falsifcation of fnancial statements” is widely used and seems clear in terms of common sense, the scientifc understanding and normative defnition of this concept is not so defnite. This article analyzes the concept of “falsifcation of fnancial statements” and approaches to its defnition in foreign and domestic practice; reviews modern tools to identify risks of fnancial statements falsifcation; discusses issues related to the use of mathematical models to identify the risk of fnancial statements falsifcation. To do this the authors analyze the index model of the American scientist M. Benish, carry out econometric tests within the assumptions of the Gauss-Markov theorem and propose a variant of developing an index model to detect accounting (fnancial) statements falsifcation. An attempt was made to create a model to identify the risk of reporting information falsifcation with a certain degree of probability that could be applied in Russia. To create such a model, called NARM, there were selected 75 reports of Russian organizations, of which 1/3 were falsifed. This model makes it possible to identify the probability of fnancial statements falsifcation to within 76%.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. V. SafonovaRussian Federation
Irina V. Safonova — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of the Department of Accounting, Analyses and Audit
Moscow
A. D. Silchenko
Russian Federation
Alina D. Silchenko — 4-year student of Accounting and Audit Faculty
Moscow
References
1. Bulyga R. Business Audit: The New Concept of the XXI Century. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2014;29(5):619–622.
2. Bulyga R.P., Melnik M.V. Audit of business. Practice and problems of development. Buliga R.P., еd. Moscow: Unity-Dana; 213, p. 21. (In Russ.).
3. Sher I.F. Accounting and balance. Transl. from German by I. S. Chedirbaum. Moscow: Economy life; 1925. p. 594. (In Russ.).
4. Thornhill W. T., Wells J. T. Fraud terminology reference guide. Austin, TX: Association of Certifed Fraud Examiners, 1993.
5. Djoseph T. Wells. Handbook of Preventing and Detecting Corporate Fraud. Sukhanov M. S., еd. Moscow; Maroseyka publishers; 2008. p. 473. (In Russ.).
6. Bychkova S.M., Filatova O.N. The essence of fraud and the role of audit in its identifcation. Auditor = Auditor. 2003;1:18–29. (In Russ.).
7. Mikheev M.V. Distortions in the accounting (fnancial) statements: causes and effects. Auditor = Auditor. 2015;12:34–38. (In Russ.).
8. Sokolova N. A. Creative accounting: causes and consequences. Finansi i biznes = Finances and business. 2012;(3):143–151. (In Russ.).
9. Sotnikova L.V. Financial reporting fraud: detection and prevention. Monograph. Moscow: Buhgalterskij uchet = Accounting; 2011. 207 p. (In Russ.).
10. Shtefan M.A., Feruleva N.V. Audit of falsifcation of fnancial statements: specifc aspects. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal. 2016;14(3):49–70. (In Russ.).
11. Bulyga R.P., Volkova E.S., Gisin V.B. Trust distribution functions and multi-valued logic in risk assessment during an audit. Audit = Audit. 2016;(10):4–9; Audit M = Audit М. 2016;(12):10–15. (In Russ.).
12. Messod B.D. The detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analyst Journal. 1999;5(55):22–36.
13. Jakovenko D.A., Shestakov A.A. The main provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and its impact on the regulation and development of the securities and auditing market in the United States. Samara: Samara Territorial Institute of Professional Accountants; 2003. 15 p. (In Russ.).
14. Shtefan М.А., Ferulyova N.V. Audit of falsifcation of fnancial statements: specifc aspects. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting. 2017;(2):88–105/ (In Russ.).
15. Soboleva G.V. Analysis of Correlations between the Composition of a Company’s Board of Directors and the Risk of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Auditorskie vedomosti = Audit records. 2016;6:57–65. (In Russ.).
16. Polisyuk G.B., Korchagina L.M. Accounting (fnancial) statements: the problem of identifying information distortion. Mezhdunarodnyi bukhgalterskii uchet = International Accounting. 2013;4(250):44–52. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Safonova I.V., Silchenko A.D. Falsifcation of Financial Statements: Concept and Tools of Identifcation. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2018;5(6):37-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2018-5-6-37-49