Ecosystem Approach Use in the Economic Analysis of Business Entities
https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2025-12-1-15-26
Abstract
Relevance. Despite the emergence of new types of economic analysis, the methodology of its implementation remains unchanged. Method. The methodological basis of the research is made up of general scientific methods: comparison, generalization, analysis, and synthesis. Results. The study resulted in a revision of the approach to the coordination of targets, indicators and interests of the parties using ecosystem approach, where the key condition for the development of an ecosystem is the balance of its subsystems. An indicator of the ecosystem’s performance is the degree to which targets are met both in the ecosystem as a whole and for each participant, including brand and digital platforms.
About the Authors
N. E. Babicheva
Voronezh State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nadezhda E. Babicheva — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Prof. of the Department of International Economy and Foreign Economic
Voronezh
N. P. Lyubushin
Voronezh State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay P. Lyubushin — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof. of the Department of Economic Analysis and Audit
Voronezh
References
1. Simchera V. M. The development of the Russian economy over 100 years: 1900–2000. Historical series, ageold trends, institutional cycles. A Monograph. Moscow: Nauka; 2006. 587 p. (In Russ.).
2. Barngolts S. B. From the history of economic analysis (personal memoirs). A Monograph. Moscow: Finansovaya akademiya; 1999. 44 p. (In Russ.).
3. Babicheva N.E., Lyubushin N.P. The interaction of concepts and laws of system development in the economic analysis of business entities’ activities. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice. 2024;23(4):604–624. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/ea.23.4.604
4. Tatur S. K. History of economic analysis (1974). Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 6. Ehkonomika = Moscow University Economics Bulletin. 2016;4:149–160. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.38050/013001052016412
5. Melnik M. V. Innovations in information support of economic development management. Innovacionnoe razvitie ekonomiki = Innovative development of economy. 2018;6–2(48):57–66. (In Russ.).
6. Tansley A.G. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology. 1935;16(3):284–307.
7. Adner R., Kapoor R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management. 2010;31(3):306–333.
8. Kulapov M. N., Pereverzeva E. I., Kirillova O. Y. Business ecosystems: Defi typologies, development practices. Voprosy innovacionnoj ekonomiki = Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2022;12(3):1597–1612. (In Russ.). DOI:10.18334/vinec.12.3.115234
9. Khalin V. G., Chernova G. V., Kalaida S. A. Economic ecosystems and their classification. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie = Administrative Consulting. 2021;(2):38–54. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2021-2-38-54
10. Kleiner G.B., Rybachuk M.A., Karpinskaya V.A. Development of ecosystems in the financial sector of Russia. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2020;11(4):2–15. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-1
11. Akoff R., Emery F. About purposeful systems. Transl. from English. Moscow: Sovetskoe radio; 1974. 272 p. (In Russ.).
12. Akoff R. Planning the future of the corporation. Transl. from English. Moscow: Progress; 1985. 327 p. (In Russ.).
13. Moore J.F. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review. 1993;71(3):75–83.
14. Polyanskaya T.A. Innovation analysis as a new area of economic analysis in the context of the development of the digital economy. Sciences of Europe. 2020;51–4(51):39–43. (In Russ.).
15. Gerasimova E.B. A new type of economic analysis: Business analysis. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2016;20(3):28–33. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2016-20-3-28-33
16. Prangishvili I.V. Entropy and other systemic patterns: Issues of management of complex systems. Moscow: Nauka; 2003. 428 p. (In Russ.).
17. Statsenko V. V., Bychkova I. I. Ecosystem approach in building modern business models. Industrial’naya ehkonomika = Industrial economics. 2021;(1):45–61. (In Russ.).
18. Tsvetkov V.A. Assessment of the balance of interests in corporate systems in a transformational economy. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya = Financial Analytics: Science and Experience. 2013;6(26):2–9. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.475776/2712-7559_2021_1_45
19. Boikova E.N. Approaches to assessing the balance of interests of members of the corporate system interaction. Vestnik Universiteta = Bulletin of the University. 2014;2:189–193. (In Russ.).
20. Zhurova L.I. Methodology for assessing the balance of interests in corporate governance. Bulletin of the Samara municipal institute of management. 2022;(3):59–70. (In Russ.).
21. Kogdenko V. G., Melnik M. V. Modern trends in business analysis: Studying the company’s ecosystem, reviewing the business model’s information content, evaluating growth opportunities. Ekonomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. 2017;16(10):1878–1897. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/ea.16.10.1878
22. Melnik M.V., Suglobov A.E. Modernization of accounting, analytical and control processes in the conditions of digitalization of the economy. Problemy ehkonomiki i yuridicheskoi praktiki = Economic Problems and Legal Practice. 2021;17(2):117–126. (In Russ.).
23. Lyubushin N. P., Krasteleva E. A. The development of an ecosystem approach in the economic analysis of business entities. Sovremennaya ehkonomika: problemy i resheniya = Modern Economics: Problems and Solutions. 2024;6(174):158–169. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17308/meps/2078-9017/2024/6/158-169
24. Barilenko V. I. Expanding the complexity of economic analysis. RISK: Resursy, Informatsiya, Snabzhenie, Konkurentsiya = RISK: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition. 2021;(4):142–147. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.56584/1560-8816-2021-4-142-147
25. Efimova O.V. Forming reports on sustainable development: Stages and procedures. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2018;5(3):40–53. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2408-9303-2018-5-3-40-53
26. Aliev D.F., Fetisov V.A., Rybakov S.V. The manifesto of harmonious development. Monograph. Moscow: Promitei; 2023. 268 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Babicheva N.E., Lyubushin N.P. Ecosystem Approach Use in the Economic Analysis of Business Entities. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2025;12(1):15-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2408-9303-2025-12-1-15-26
Views:
91
.png)
.png)
Email this article 
