Comparative Analysis of the Quality of Non-Financial Information Disclosure by Russian Companies (2019–2024)

The study is dedicated to comparative analysis of the quality procedures of non-financial information disclosure practiced by Russian companies in 2019–2024. In view of the expandin experience of ESG reporting, limitations remain in terms of comparability and trust in the metrics published within it. The objective of the study is identifying the factors that determine the quality of reporting and describing the procedures that increase evidential support and analytic decision-making usefulness for investors, creditors etc. The authors use a comparative design, document review together with structured content analysis of corporate disclosures within the period of 2019–2024, which allow for the research of corporate reporting (including both sustainability reports and integrated annual reports with ESG sections containing environmental, social and governance indicators, as well as ESG databooks / data rooms). The quality is assessed across four dimensions: consistency and completeness, verifiability and methodological transparency, the role of governance involvement in reporting processes, and external assurance through audit or independent verification. The results illustrate, that leading companies provide multi-year indicator dynamics, disclose calculation methods and restatements, assign board-level responsibility, and more often secure external assurance, while formal reports of smaller entities rely on predominantly narrative claims with limited quantitative evidence. The authors of the article conclude the requirement of standard methods for compiling non-financial data, establishing management responsibility for its accuracy, and expanding independent verification of disclosed information. The results of the study may be useful to companies, auditors, regulators, investors, and creditors involved in assessing the quality of non-financial reporting, improving its preparation procedures, and selecting mechanisms for independent verification of disclosed information.

1. Jadoon I. A., Ali A., Ayub U., Tahir M., Mumtaz R. The impact of sustainability reporting quality on the value relevance of corporate sustainability performance. Sustainable Development. 2021;29(1):155-175. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2138

2. Rahman A. F., Kurniawati D. T., Dewi A. A., Kholilah K. The value relevance of sustainability disclosure quality. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi. 2023;8(2):379-398. DOI: 10.23887/jia.v8i2.68924

3. Chugumbaev R. R. How current geopolitics affects the disclosure of non-financial information by Russian companies. Economic Policy. 2025;20(4):170-193. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2025-4-170-193

4. Adardour Z., Ed-Dafali S., Mohiuddin M., El Mortagi O., Sbai H., Bouzahir B. Exploring the drivers of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure in an emerging market context using a mixed methods approach. Future Business Journal. 2025;11:107. DOI: 10.1186/s43093-025-00530-w

5. Rohendi H., Ghozali I., Ratmono D. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm value: The role of competitive advantage as a mediator. Cogent Business & Management. 2024;11(1):2297446. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2297446

6. Wan Mohammad W. M., Wasiuzzaman S. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems. 2021;2:100015. DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100015

7. Erben Yavuz A., Kocaman B. E., Doğan M., Hazar A., Babuşcu Ş., Sutbayeva R. The impact of corporate governance on sustainability disclosures: A comparison from the perspective of financial and non-financial firms. Sustainability. 2024;16(19):8400. DOI: 10.3390/su16198400

8. AlHares A. Does financial performance improve the quality of sustainability reporting? Exploring the moderating effect of corporate governance. Sustainability. 2025;17:6123. DOI: 10.3390/su17136123

9. Sundarasen S., Rajagopalan U., Zyznarska-Dworczak B. Sustainability reporting as a governance tool for sustainable development goals (SDGs): A bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability. 2025;17:4784. DOI: 10.3390/su17114784

10. Sannikova I. N., Semikolenova M. N. Non-financial reporting: Practice of generating and monitoring ESG data. Ehkonomika. Professiya. Biznes. = Economics Profession Business. 2024;(1):64-71. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14258/epb202409

11. Sannikova I. N., Semikolenova M. N. ESG-data in the non-financial reporting of Russian businesses. ECO. 2024;54(5):104-119. (In Russ.). DOI: ECO0131-7652-2024-5-104-119

12. Tyuleneva N. A., Demidova D. K. Statistical assessment of ESG business transformation based on non-financial reporting data. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ehkonomika. = Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2023;(64):115-133. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17223/19988648/64/9

13. Azevedo G., Oliveira J., Sousa I., Borges M. F., Tavares M. C., Vale J. Disclosure of sustainability information under the corporate social responsibility directive: The degree of compliance of portuguese stock index companies. International Journal of Financial Studies. 2025;13(1):13. DOI: 10.3390/ijfs13010013

14. Papafloratos T., Pantazi T. A Systematic review of the effects of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Sustainability. 2025;17(12):5336. DOI: 10.3390/su171253366

15. Aydoğmuş M., Gülay G., Ergun K. Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2022;22(S2): S119–S127. DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006

16. Fedorova E. A., Stepnov I. M., Drogovoz P. A., Rashchupkina A. A., Remesnik A. A. Impact of the level of disclosure of corporate social responsibility on the share price: Quantitative and textual analysis. Ehkonomicheskii zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ehkonomiki. = HSE Economic Journal. 2021;25(3):423-451. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1813-8691-2021-25-3-423-451

17. Gong Q., Gu J., Kong Z., Shen S., Dong X., Li Y., Li C. The impact of ESG ratings on corporate sustainability: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Sustainability. 2025;17(13):5942. DOI: 10.3390/su17135942

18. Yip Y. Investigating the relationship between ESG disclosure performance and audit fees in the presence of institutional ownership: Evidence from Malaysian listed firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2025;18(12):688. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm18120688

19. Luque-Vílchez M., Cordazzo M., Rimmel G., Tilt C. A. Key aspects of sustainability reporting quality and the future of GRI. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2023;14(4):637-659. DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2023-0127

20. Serebryakova T. Yu. Non-financial reporting and compliance control. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis. Auditing. 2023;10(3):33-44. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2408-9303-2023-10-3-33-44

21. Pizzi S., Venturelli A., Caputo F. Restoring trust in sustainability reporting: The enabling role of the external assurance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2024;68:101437. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2024.101437